fix(family-sharing): prevent silent data loss when rehoming or removing users (#1896)

* fix(family-sharing): prevent silent data loss when rehoming or removing users

Fixes #1689.

Two destructive paths could strand a pre-existing user's family and accounts:

1. Invitation#accept_for unconditionally overwrote user.family_id, orphaning
   the prior family + its accounts with no user able to reach them.
2. Settings::ProfilesController#destroy then called @user.destroy when an admin
   removed the rehomed member, destroying the only login path back to the
   now-orphaned data.

Add hard-block guards on both paths. accept_for refuses when the invitee
already belongs to a family with accounts; ProfilesController#destroy refuses
when the member owns accounts in another family (legacy state from the old
flow). InvitationsController#create surfaces a specific, actionable flash so
the admin understands why the auto-accept was refused.

No automatic recovery of already-orphaned data — that needs a separate
one-shot script per dosubot's analysis on the issue.

* fix(family-sharing): scope invite orphan-guard to invitee-owned accounts (#1896 review)

Codex flagged (P1) and the maintainer review independently raised that
would_orphan_existing_family? keyed off user.family.accounts.exists? —
any account in the invitee's current family — which wrongly blocked a
non-owner member from leaving a multi-user household.

Rename to would_orphan_owned_accounts? and key off
user.owned_accounts.where.not(family_id: family_id), making the invite
guard symmetric with the destroy-path guard in
Settings::ProfilesController. A member who owns no accounts now orphans
nothing by moving and is free to accept the invitation; an owner is
still blocked.

Add a regression test for the non-owner case and update the existing
tests to give the invitee explicit account ownership.

* Remove extra comments per project conventions

---------

Co-authored-by: Juan José Mata <jjmata@jjmata.com>
This commit is contained in:
dripsmvcp
2026-05-28 06:25:46 +09:00
committed by GitHub
parent 12aff3cef7
commit ab52b2b144
7 changed files with 98 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -59,6 +59,25 @@ class Settings::ProfilesControllerTest < ActionDispatch::IntegrationTest
assert User.find(@admin.id)
end
test "admin cannot destroy a member who owns accounts in another family" do
other_family = families(:empty)
legacy_account = other_family.accounts.create!(
name: "Legacy savings", balance: 250, currency: "USD",
accountable: Depository.new
)
legacy_account.update_columns(owner_id: @member.id)
sign_in @admin
assert_no_difference("User.count") do
delete settings_profile_path(user_id: @member)
end
assert_redirected_to settings_profile_path
assert_equal I18n.t("settings.profiles.destroy.member_owns_other_family_data"), flash[:alert]
assert User.find(@member.id), "user row must be preserved so historical access can be restored"
end
test "admin removing a family member also destroys their invitation" do
# Create an invitation for the member
invitation = @admin.family.invitations.create!(

View File

@@ -122,6 +122,65 @@ class InvitationTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
assert_includes invitation.errors[:email], "has already been invited to this family"
end
test "accept_for refuses when invitee owns accounts that would be orphaned" do
owner = users(:empty)
owner_family = families(:empty)
owner.update_columns(family_id: owner_family.id, role: "admin")
account = owner_family.accounts.create!(
name: "Prior savings", balance: 100, currency: "USD",
accountable: Depository.new
)
account.update_columns(owner_id: owner.id)
invitation = @family.invitations.create!(email: owner.email, role: "member", inviter: @inviter)
result = invitation.accept_for(owner)
assert_not result, "accept_for must refuse to rehome a user away from accounts they own"
owner.reload
assert_equal owner_family.id, owner.family_id, "user.family_id must not be silently overwritten"
invitation.reload
assert_nil invitation.accepted_at, "invitation must remain pending so a new flow can recover"
assert owner_family.accounts.exists?, "original family's accounts must remain intact"
end
test "accept_for allows a member who owns no accounts to join another family" do
member = users(:empty)
other_owner = users(:sure_support_staff)
source_family = families(:empty)
member.update_columns(family_id: source_family.id, role: "member")
other_owner.update_columns(family_id: source_family.id, role: "admin")
account = source_family.accounts.create!(
name: "Shared savings", balance: 100, currency: "USD",
accountable: Depository.new
)
account.update_columns(owner_id: other_owner.id)
invitation = @family.invitations.create!(email: member.email, role: "member", inviter: @inviter)
result = invitation.accept_for(member)
assert result, "a non-owner member must be free to join another family"
member.reload
assert_equal @family.id, member.family_id
end
test "would_orphan_owned_accounts? is false when invitee owns no accounts" do
user = users(:empty)
user.update_columns(family_id: families(:empty).id, role: "admin")
invitation = @family.invitations.create!(email: user.email, role: "member", inviter: @inviter)
assert_not invitation.would_orphan_owned_accounts?(user)
end
test "would_orphan_owned_accounts? is false when same-family role change" do
user = users(:family_member)
user.update!(family_id: @family.id, role: "member")
invitation = @family.invitations.create!(email: user.email, role: "admin", inviter: @inviter)
assert_not invitation.would_orphan_owned_accounts?(user)
end
test "accept_for applies guest role defaults" do
user = users(:family_member)
user.update!(