mirror of
https://github.com/we-promise/sure.git
synced 2026-04-19 12:04:08 +00:00
fix: Lunchflow pending transaction duplicates, missing from search and filter (#859)
* fix: lunchflow parity with simplefin/plaid pending behaviour * fix: don't suggest duplicate if both entries are pending * refactor: reuse the same external_id for re-synced pending transactions * chore: replace illogical duplicate collision test with multiple sync test * fix: prevent duplicates when users edit pending lunchflow transactions * chore: add test for preventing duplicates when users edit pending lunchflow transactions * fix: normalise extra hash keys for pending detection
This commit is contained in:
@@ -77,10 +77,14 @@ class Account::ProviderImportAdapter
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
# If still a new entry and this is a POSTED transaction, check for matching pending transactions
|
||||
incoming_pending = extra.is_a?(Hash) && (
|
||||
ActiveModel::Type::Boolean.new.cast(extra.dig("simplefin", "pending")) ||
|
||||
ActiveModel::Type::Boolean.new.cast(extra.dig("plaid", "pending"))
|
||||
)
|
||||
incoming_pending = false
|
||||
if extra.is_a?(Hash)
|
||||
pending_extra = extra.with_indifferent_access
|
||||
incoming_pending =
|
||||
ActiveModel::Type::Boolean.new.cast(pending_extra.dig("simplefin", "pending")) ||
|
||||
ActiveModel::Type::Boolean.new.cast(pending_extra.dig("plaid", "pending")) ||
|
||||
ActiveModel::Type::Boolean.new.cast(pending_extra.dig("lunchflow", "pending"))
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
if entry.new_record? && !incoming_pending
|
||||
pending_match = nil
|
||||
@@ -686,6 +690,7 @@ class Account::ProviderImportAdapter
|
||||
.where(<<~SQL.squish)
|
||||
(transactions.extra -> 'simplefin' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
OR (transactions.extra -> 'plaid' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
OR (transactions.extra -> 'lunchflow' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
SQL
|
||||
.order(date: :desc) # Prefer most recent pending transaction
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -731,6 +736,7 @@ class Account::ProviderImportAdapter
|
||||
.where(<<~SQL.squish)
|
||||
(transactions.extra -> 'simplefin' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
OR (transactions.extra -> 'plaid' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
OR (transactions.extra -> 'lunchflow' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
SQL
|
||||
|
||||
# If merchant_id is provided, prioritize matching by merchant
|
||||
@@ -799,6 +805,7 @@ class Account::ProviderImportAdapter
|
||||
.where(<<~SQL.squish)
|
||||
(transactions.extra -> 'simplefin' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
OR (transactions.extra -> 'plaid' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
OR (transactions.extra -> 'lunchflow' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
SQL
|
||||
|
||||
# For low confidence, require BOTH merchant AND name match (stronger signal needed)
|
||||
@@ -836,6 +843,11 @@ class Account::ProviderImportAdapter
|
||||
# Don't overwrite if already has a suggestion (keep first one found)
|
||||
return if existing_extra["potential_posted_match"].present?
|
||||
|
||||
# Don't suggest if the posted entry is also still pending (pending→pending match)
|
||||
# Suggestions are only for pending→posted reconciliation
|
||||
posted_transaction = posted_entry.entryable
|
||||
return if posted_transaction.is_a?(Transaction) && posted_transaction.pending?
|
||||
|
||||
pending_transaction.update!(
|
||||
extra: existing_extra.merge(
|
||||
"potential_posted_match" => {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ class Entry < ApplicationRecord
|
||||
.where(<<~SQL.squish)
|
||||
(transactions.extra -> 'simplefin' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
OR (transactions.extra -> 'plaid' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
OR (transactions.extra -> 'lunchflow' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
SQL
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -56,6 +57,7 @@ class Entry < ApplicationRecord
|
||||
AND (
|
||||
(t.extra -> 'simplefin' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
OR (t.extra -> 'plaid' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
OR (t.extra -> 'lunchflow' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
SQL
|
||||
@@ -118,6 +120,7 @@ class Entry < ApplicationRecord
|
||||
.where(<<~SQL.squish)
|
||||
(transactions.extra -> 'simplefin' ->> 'pending')::boolean IS NOT TRUE
|
||||
AND (transactions.extra -> 'plaid' ->> 'pending')::boolean IS NOT TRUE
|
||||
AND (transactions.extra -> 'lunchflow' ->> 'pending')::boolean IS NOT TRUE
|
||||
SQL
|
||||
.limit(2) # Only need to know if 0, 1, or 2+ candidates
|
||||
.to_a # Load limited records to avoid COUNT(*) on .size
|
||||
@@ -164,6 +167,7 @@ class Entry < ApplicationRecord
|
||||
.where(<<~SQL.squish)
|
||||
(transactions.extra -> 'simplefin' ->> 'pending')::boolean IS NOT TRUE
|
||||
AND (transactions.extra -> 'plaid' ->> 'pending')::boolean IS NOT TRUE
|
||||
AND (transactions.extra -> 'lunchflow' ->> 'pending')::boolean IS NOT TRUE
|
||||
SQL
|
||||
|
||||
# Match by name similarity (first 3 words)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ class EntrySearch
|
||||
AND (
|
||||
(t.extra -> 'simplefin' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
OR (t.extra -> 'plaid' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
OR (t.extra -> 'lunchflow' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
SQL
|
||||
@@ -82,6 +83,7 @@ class EntrySearch
|
||||
AND (
|
||||
(t.extra -> 'simplefin' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
OR (t.extra -> 'plaid' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
OR (t.extra -> 'lunchflow' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
SQL
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -73,10 +73,20 @@ class LunchflowEntry::Processor
|
||||
base_temp_id = content_hash_for_transaction(data)
|
||||
temp_id_with_prefix = "lunchflow_pending_#{base_temp_id}"
|
||||
|
||||
# Handle collisions: if this external_id already exists for this account,
|
||||
# append a counter to make it unique. This prevents multiple pending transactions
|
||||
# with identical attributes (e.g., two same-day Uber rides) from colliding.
|
||||
# We check both the account's entries and the current raw payload being processed.
|
||||
# Check if entry with this external_id already exists
|
||||
# If it does AND it's still pending, reuse the same ID for re-sync.
|
||||
# The import adapter's skip logic will handle user edits correctly.
|
||||
# We DON'T check if attributes match - user edits should not cause duplicates.
|
||||
if entry_exists_with_external_id?(temp_id_with_prefix)
|
||||
existing_entry = account.entries.find_by(external_id: temp_id_with_prefix, source: "lunchflow")
|
||||
if existing_entry && existing_entry.entryable.is_a?(Transaction) && existing_entry.entryable.pending?
|
||||
Rails.logger.debug "Lunchflow: Reusing ID #{temp_id_with_prefix} for re-synced pending transaction"
|
||||
return temp_id_with_prefix
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
# Handle true collisions: multiple different transactions with same attributes
|
||||
# (e.g., two Uber rides on the same day for the same amount within the same sync)
|
||||
final_id = temp_id_with_prefix
|
||||
counter = 1
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -185,11 +185,13 @@ class Transaction::Search
|
||||
pending_condition = <<~SQL.squish
|
||||
(transactions.extra -> 'simplefin' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
OR (transactions.extra -> 'plaid' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
OR (transactions.extra -> 'lunchflow' ->> 'pending')::boolean = true
|
||||
SQL
|
||||
|
||||
confirmed_condition = <<~SQL.squish
|
||||
(transactions.extra -> 'simplefin' ->> 'pending')::boolean IS DISTINCT FROM true
|
||||
AND (transactions.extra -> 'plaid' ->> 'pending')::boolean IS DISTINCT FROM true
|
||||
AND (transactions.extra -> 'lunchflow' ->> 'pending')::boolean IS DISTINCT FROM true
|
||||
SQL
|
||||
|
||||
case statuses.sort
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user