mirror of
https://github.com/we-promise/sure.git
synced 2026-05-08 13:14:58 +00:00
83cb287294
* chore(design-system): swap raw gray classes for semantic tokens in settings/
Pilot for the broader raw-color sweep. Maps 21 occurrences across 11
files to design-system equivalents:
- text-white bg-gray-900 hover:bg-gray-800 (CTA buttons)
-> text-inverse button-bg-primary hover:button-bg-primary-hover
- bg-gray-25 / bg-gray-50 / bg-gray-100 (subtle surface backgrounds)
-> bg-surface-inset
- bg-gray-800 (tooltip pills) -> bg-inverse
- text-white inside tooltips -> text-inverse
- text-gray-300 (muted tooltip labels) -> text-inverse opacity-70
- text-gray-600 (muted body text) -> text-secondary
- hover:text-gray-700 -> hover:text-primary
- focus:ring-gray-900 -> focus:ring-button-bg-primary
The 7 status-indicator dots (`bg-gray-400`) are intentionally left
as raw classes. Gray-400 against both light and dark container bgs
gives reasonable contrast either way, and there's no semantic token
that fits a "neutral inactive indicator" use case yet. Worth a
follow-up if a `bg-subdued` token would benefit other places.
* fix(design-system): use theme-aware focus ring on provider submit buttons
Two issues caught in code review:
1. focus:ring-button-bg-primary silently emits no CSS (CodeRabbit, Codex).
button-bg-primary is a custom @utility, not a theme color, so Tailwind's
ring-{name} resolution finds no --color-button-bg-primary and falls
back to the default. Replaces with focus:ring-gray-900
theme-dark:focus:ring-white — same color flip as the button bg, but
resolved through theme colors so ring-{name} actually generates CSS.
2. _enable_banking_panel.html.erb dropped focus-ring + transition entirely
in the original sweep (CodeRabbit). Restores parity with the other
provider panels using the corrected ring classes.
Long-term cleanup: tracked under issue #1653 (modifier-aware utilities)
to make button-bg-primary also a theme color so ring-button-bg-primary
becomes valid.