* Expose the Statement Vault to external agents over MCP A user wants to manage patrimonial history — a document-backed record of a family's wealth where every figure traces back to the statement it came from — by pointing an external agent harness at Sure. That model belongs in the harness, not in Sure: it needs numbered build deltas, golden tests and closed periods that a mutable Postgres row cannot provide. What Sure was missing was the seam. The Statement Vault already does most of the work — original bytes retained, SHA-256 dedup, period detection, account matching with a confidence score, reconciliation against ledger balances, and a month-by-month coverage map — but it is reachable only from the web UI. An agent could not archive a document, cite one, or check for gaps. Adds five preview MCP tools over what already exists, plus a citation grammar for values the agent writes: - upload_account_statement, list_account_statements, get_account_statement, get_statement_coverage - record_valuation, whose source citation is parsed rather than trusted: ["estimated: "] citation [" (grade: A|B|C)"]. An uncited or free-styled value is rejected at the write boundary instead of landing in the ledger looking authoritative. link and reject are deliberately not exposed. Attaching a statement to an account is the human's decision, and the vault UI is where it is made; the agent reports the suggested match and stops there. Assistant.function_classes now takes a user so preview tools stay out of the default surface. They are hidden from tools/list and not callable by name without the preference enabled, and the vault tools re-check the manager role and per-account permissions, since MCP calls never pass through a controller. Docs: the blueprint this implements, and a guide covering which side owns which layer, the vocabulary map between the two, the monthly runbook, and the gaps (non-user holders, non-statement documents, one value per date). No migrations, no API endpoints, no UI. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JFDp9HhXDeswadu4cxFojn * Address review feedback on the vault MCP tools Two non-blocking items from the review pass: Document why get_statement_coverage reads through accessible_by rather than writable_by. It reports which documents exist and writes nothing, so read access is the right bar — and tightening it would hide coverage gaps from people who can already see the figures those gaps sit behind. The comment exists so a future refactor doesn't "fix" it. Close the acknowledged verification gap with tests rather than a one-off manual check. The review noted that nothing proved a real vault payload serializes cleanly out through tools/call — vault responses are richer than the other tools' output, with nested account hashes, decimal balances, dates and a compacted hash. Two integration tests now drive the real /mcp endpoint end to end against a real AccountStatement: one listing it, one uploading bytes and reading back the SHA-256. Permanent regression coverage instead of a smoke test someone has to remember to repeat. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JFDp9HhXDeswadu4cxFojn * docs(llm-guides): replace patrimonial blueprint with its final revision Swap the embedded early draft for the authoritative final revision of the wealth + tax modelling blueprint (MIT © 2026 diegomarino): - rename the domain vocabulary: patrimonial -> wealth, fiscal -> tax (tax_data/, the tax layer, tax_runner) - add §9.5 (the intel file: shape, generation, and the capture loop) - tighten worked examples down to placeholders - add the MIT header; keep the in-repo NOTE block (adapted to the new vocabulary) and the filename untouched so cross-links don't break * docs(llm-guides): align agent-harness guide with blueprint + fix reconcile semantics Follow the blueprint rename (patrimonial -> wealth, fiscal -> tax, fiscal_data/ -> tax_data/, "Phase 7 (fiscal layer)" -> "(the tax layer)") so the two docs stop disagreeing on vocabulary. Correct the reconciliation mapping, which conflated two different invariants: - blueprint reconcile-or-abort (§7 pass 3) is parse-integrity (parsed parts == the document's own printed total); Sure's reconciliation_checks is ledger agreement (statement balances vs the ledger). Sure has no parse-integrity check and never aborts. - opening_balance / closing_balance are user-entered, not auto-extracted, so over MCP reconciliation is "unavailable" until a human fills them. - tolerance differs: blueprint 1.00/account-period vs Sure's fixed 0.01. State in the ownership table, the invariants section, the vocabulary map and the monthly runbook that parse-integrity and the abort belong to the harness extractor. * Correct the vault tools' reconciliation claims and citation parsing Review findings from @diegomarino, all verified against the code before changing anything. The reconciliation claim was the serious one. get_account_statement told agents the checks were "the trustworthy part" and returned "the balances read off it" — but nothing reads balances off a document. MetadataDetector never touches them and create_from_prepared_upload! never sets them; they are user-editable fields in the Statement Vault UI. So a statement archived over MCP always came back with an empty check list, which an agent could easily read as "the document agrees with the ledger" when it means "nobody has entered the figures". The description now says so, and the payload carries a reconciliation_note spelling it out for anything reading only the JSON. Also noted that these checks are ledger agreement, not parse integrity: nothing here verifies a document's parts sum to its printed total. Provenance::Citation had two patterns disagreeing about spacing. GRADE_SUFFIX allowed "(grade:A)" but FORMAT required exactly one space, so that citation passed the pre-check and then parsed as ungraded with the grade swallowed into the text — silently discarding the reliability the caller supplied, which is the one thing this parser exists to prevent. list_account_statements downcases content_sha256 before querying. The column is constrained to lowercase hex, so uppercase input could never match, and an agent would read the empty result as "not archived" and upload a duplicate. Its period filters are renamed overlapping_from / overlapping_until, since they match on overlap and the old names claimed otherwise to anyone reading the schema without the descriptions. has_more now explains that there is no cursor and the way forward is a bigger limit or narrower filters. record_valuation no longer overwrites the entry's notes. Re-recording a date would destroy a note a person had written there. Nothing is removed now: an identical citation is a no-op, a changed one is appended, and the trail of what was cited when survives. Detecting "did this tool write that line?" is not possible — almost any prose parses as a valid ungraded citation — so the code does not guess. Minor: accept urlsafe base64 on upload, and explain in the code why record_valuation checks the account ACL rather than the vault manager role, so nobody "tightens" it into the wrong permission later. Tests cover each: the grade-spacing cases both ways, uppercase SHA lookup, overlap window boundaries, note preservation and no-stacking, the unavailable reconciliation note appearing and disappearing, and — per the review — that the download URL's signed id actually expires, rather than trusting the description's claim. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JFDp9HhXDeswadu4cxFojn * Repair a bad merge in the MCP controller test The merge of main spliced the incoming `tools/call executes update_transaction` test into the middle of the upload round-trip test, before its closing `end`. That left the file one `end` short, so it did not parse — taking out both `ci / lint` (Lint/Syntax) and `ci / test_unit` (the whole file failed to load). Restores the missing `end`. Both tests are kept as their authors wrote them; nothing else changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JFDp9HhXDeswadu4cxFojn * docs: use wealth history wording (#2885) * Stop the vault tools promising verification they don't perform Three findings from the automated review passes, all confirmed against the code before changing anything. The download URL was dead on arrival for the caller it was built for. Sure serves stored files through Active Storage controllers that config/initializers/active_storage_authorization.rb gates on `viewable_by?(Current.user)` — a signed-in browser session. An MCP client has a bearer token and no session, so following the URL would have redirected to sign-in. Removed it rather than leaving a link that cannot work, and the description now points at search_family_files or the vault UI. Coverage called a month `covered` when a document merely existed. An unreconciled statement is not mismatched, so it took the `covered` branch, and the payload carried nothing to correct the reading — the same "advertised verification that never happened" bug fixed last round in get_account_statement, in a second place. Months now carry their own reconciliation_status, and the description says covered means presence, not agreement. Listing filtered visibility after limiting. Beyond underfilling a page, with no cursor and a 100-row cap an accessible statement behind enough newer invisible ones was unreachable. Visibility now lives in the query, mirroring viewable_by? for a statement manager. Also: rescue unexpected upload failures into a tool error instead of a raw exception string, derive the documented size limit from MAX_FILE_SIZE, list every coverage status in mcp.md, and cover the failed-reconciliation and base64-normalisation branches. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JFDp9HhXDeswadu4cxFojn * Keep storage exception detail out of the MCP response The upload_failed message interpolated the exception text, which crosses out to an external agent. A storage failure can carry bucket names, object keys, paths or request details, so the agent now gets a fixed message and the exception stays in the server log. The test asserts the absence of detail rather than pinning the leaked string into the contract. Also fixes a test that did not test what it claimed: the urlsafe-base64 case used a fixture encoding to plain base64, so it exercised the padding branch and never the "-_" translation. It now uses content whose encoding contains both characters and asserts that up front. Renames "rejects content that decodes to zero bytes" to "rejects blank content", which is what it actually covers — Base64.strict_encode64("") is "", which is blank and returns before the decoder runs, so invalid_content is correct and empty_file is not reachable from this path. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JFDp9HhXDeswadu4cxFojn * docs: align wealth blueprint review feedback * Correct the harness runbook: parse before publishing The guide told an implementer to archive each document to Sure first and work from there. That strands them. Sure never returns a document's bytes over MCP — Active Storage serves stored files only to a signed-in browser session — and there is no text fallback either, because statements archived through upload_account_statement never enter the vector store, so search_family_files cannot see them. A statement in Sure is metadata to an agent and nothing more. That blocks exactly three blueprint steps, all of them operating on bank and broker statements: the extractors, the parts-vs-printed-total check, and the glyph decoder. Everything else it parses — tax returns, capital accounts, annual accounts — the harness already holds locally. So the order inverts: the harness ingests into its own vault, extracts there with the whole file in reach, and publishes to Sure afterwards. This restores principle 8 rather than bending it — the recurring pipeline reads from the canonical store, and treating Sure as canonical forced a re-fetch the architecture never sanctioned. Both sides hash the same bytes, so the SHA-256 verifies Sure holds the identical document without moving it. Writes down the two consequences: a statement uploaded straight into Sure's UI can be known but never parsed (reliability C or PENDING until a copy reaches the harness), and neither vault backs up the other. Also drops a stale tools-table row still advertising the 15-minute download URL removed earlier, corrects get_account_statement's description where it suggested search_family_files as a fallback it cannot be, and disambiguates "the vault" in the MCP tool table, which is what misled me in the first place. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JFDp9HhXDeswadu4cxFojn --------- Signed-off-by: Juan José Mata <juanjo.mata@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: diegomarino <diegomarino@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sure Admin (bot) <sure-admin@splashblot.com>
46 KiB
LLM Configuration Guide
This document explains how Sure uses Large Language Models (LLMs) for AI features and how to configure them for your deployment.
Overview
Sure includes an AI assistant that can help users understand their financial data by answering questions about accounts, transactions, income, expenses, net worth, and more. The assistant uses LLMs to process natural language queries and provide insights based on the user's financial data.
Caution
Only
gpt-4.1was ever supported prior tov0.6.5-alpha*builds!
👉 Help us by taking a structured approach to your issue reporting. 🙏
Architecture: Two AI Pipelines
Sure has two separate AI systems that operate independently. Understanding this is important because they have different configuration requirements.
1. Chat Assistant (conversational)
The interactive chat where users ask questions about their finances. Routes through one of two backends:
- Builtin (default): Uses the OpenAI-compatible provider configured via
OPENAI_ACCESS_TOKEN/OPENAI_URI_BASE/OPENAI_MODEL. Calls Sure's function tools directly (get_accounts, get_transactions, etc.). - External: Delegates the entire conversation to a remote AI agent. The agent calls back to Sure via MCP to access financial data. Set
ASSISTANT_TYPE=externalas a global override, or configure each family's assistant type in Settings.
2. Auto-Categorization and Merchant Detection (background)
Background jobs that classify transactions and detect merchants. These always use the OpenAI-compatible provider (OPENAI_ACCESS_TOKEN), regardless of what the chat assistant uses. They rely on structured function calling with JSON schemas, not conversational chat.
What this means in practice
| Setting | Chat assistant | Auto-categorization |
|---|---|---|
ASSISTANT_TYPE=builtin (default) |
Uses OpenAI provider | Uses OpenAI provider |
ASSISTANT_TYPE=external |
Uses external agent | Still uses OpenAI provider |
If you use an external agent for chat, you still need OPENAI_ACCESS_TOKEN set for auto-categorization and merchant detection to work. The two systems are fully independent.
Quickstart: OpenAI Token
The easiest way to get started with AI features in Sure is to use OpenAI:
- Get an API key from OpenAI
- Set the environment variable:
OPENAI_ACCESS_TOKEN=sk-proj-...your-key-here... - (Re-)Start Sure (both
webandworkerservices!) and the AI assistant will be available to use after you agree/allow via UI option
That's it! Sure will use OpenAI's with a default model (currently gpt-4.1) for all AI operations.
Local vs. Cloud Inference
Cloud Inference (Recommended for Most Users)
What it means: The LLM runs on remote servers (like OpenAI's infrastructure), and your app sends requests over the internet.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Zero setup - works immediately | Requires internet connection |
| Always uses the latest models | Data leaves your infrastructure (though transmitted securely) |
| No hardware requirements | Per-request costs |
| Scales automatically | Dependent on provider availability |
| Regular updates and improvements |
When to use:
- You're new to LLMs
- You want the best performance without setup
- You don't have powerful hardware (GPU with large VRAM)
- You're okay with cloud-based processing
- You're running a managed instance
Local Inference (Self-Hosted)
What it means: The LLM runs on your own hardware using tools like Ollama, LM Studio, or LocalAI.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Complete data privacy - nothing leaves your network | Requires significant hardware (see below) |
| No per-request costs after initial setup | Setup and maintenance overhead |
| Works offline | Models may be less capable than latest cloud offerings |
| Full control over models and updates | You manage updates and improvements |
| Can be more cost-effective at scale | Performance depends on your hardware |
Hardware Requirements:
The amount of VRAM (GPU memory) you need depends on the model size:
-
Minimum (8GB VRAM): Can run 7B parameter models like
llama3.2:7borgemma2:7b- Works for basic chat functionality
- May struggle with complex financial analysis
-
Recommended (16GB+ VRAM): Can run 13B-14B parameter models like
llama3.1:13borqwen2.5:14b- Good balance of performance and hardware requirements
- Handles most financial queries well
-
Ideal (24GB+ VRAM): Can run 30B+ parameter models or run smaller models with higher precision
- Best quality responses
- Complex reasoning about financial data
CPU-only inference: Possible but extremely slow (10-100x slower). Not recommended for production use.
When to use:
- Privacy is critical (regulated industries, sensitive financial data)
- You have the required hardware
- You're comfortable with technical setup
- You want to minimize ongoing costs
- You need offline functionality
Cloud Providers
Sure supports any OpenAI-compatible API endpoint. Here are tested providers:
OpenAI (Primary Support)
OPENAI_ACCESS_TOKEN=sk-proj-...
# No other configuration needed
# Optional: Request timeout in seconds (default: 60)
# OPENAI_REQUEST_TIMEOUT=60
Recommended models:
gpt-4.1- Default, best balance of speed and qualitygpt-5- Latest model, highest quality (more expensive)gpt-4o-mini- Cheaper, good quality
Pricing: See OpenAI Pricing
Google Gemini (via OpenRouter)
OpenRouter provides access to many models including Gemini:
OPENAI_ACCESS_TOKEN=your-openrouter-api-key
OPENAI_URI_BASE=https://openrouter.ai/api/v1
OPENAI_MODEL=google/gemini-2.0-flash-exp
Why OpenRouter?
- Single API for multiple providers
- Competitive pricing
- Automatic fallbacks
- Usage tracking
Recommended Gemini models via OpenRouter:
google/gemini-2.5-flash- Fast and capablegoogle/gemini-2.5-pro- High quality, good for complex queries
Anthropic Claude (via OpenRouter)
OPENAI_ACCESS_TOKEN=your-openrouter-api-key
OPENAI_URI_BASE=https://openrouter.ai/api/v1
OPENAI_MODEL=anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet
Recommended Claude models:
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5- Excellent reasoning, good with financial dataanthropic/claude-haiku-4.5- Fast and cost-effective
Other Providers
Any service offering an OpenAI-compatible API should work:
- Groq - Fast inference, free tier available
- Together AI - Various open models
- Anyscale - Llama models
- Replicate - Various models
Local LLM Setup (Ollama)
Ollama is the recommended tool for running LLMs locally.
Installation
-
Install Ollama:
# macOS brew install ollama # Linux curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh # Windows # Download from https://ollama.com/download -
Start Ollama:
ollama serve -
Pull a model:
# Smaller, faster (requires 8GB VRAM) ollama pull gemma2:7b # Balanced (requires 16GB VRAM) ollama pull llama3.1:13b # Larger, more capable (requires 24GB+ VRAM) ollama pull qwen2.5:32b
Configuration
Configure Sure to use Ollama:
# Dummy token (Ollama doesn't need authentication)
OPENAI_ACCESS_TOKEN=ollama-local
# Ollama API endpoint
OPENAI_URI_BASE=http://localhost:11434/v1
# Model you pulled
OPENAI_MODEL=llama3.1:13b
# Raise this for large-context local models so auto-categorize and merchant detection
# have enough prompt budget for categories + schemas before transaction rows are added.
LLM_CONTEXT_WINDOW=8192
# Slow local models often need a longer HTTP timeout once the prompt budget issue is fixed.
OPENAI_REQUEST_TIMEOUT=180
# Optional: enable debug logging in the AI chat
AI_DEBUG_MODE=true
Important: When using Ollama or any custom provider:
- You must set
OPENAI_MODEL- the system cannot default togpt-4.1as that model won't exist in Ollama - The
OPENAI_ACCESS_TOKENcan be any non-empty value (Ollama ignores it) - If you don't set a model, chats will fail with a validation error
- Auto-categorization uses a conservative default
LLM_CONTEXT_WINDOW=2048, so large category lists or schemas can exhaust the prompt budget before any transactions are sent - If requests start timing out after raising
LLM_CONTEXT_WINDOW, increaseOPENAI_REQUEST_TIMEOUTtoo; these are separate limits
Docker Compose Example
services:
sure:
environment:
- OPENAI_ACCESS_TOKEN=ollama-local
- OPENAI_URI_BASE=http://ollama:11434/v1
- OPENAI_MODEL=llama3.1:13b
- LLM_CONTEXT_WINDOW=8192
- OPENAI_REQUEST_TIMEOUT=180
- AI_DEBUG_MODE=true # Optional: enable debug logging in the AI chat
depends_on:
- ollama
ollama:
image: ollama/ollama:latest
ports:
- "11434:11434"
volumes:
- ollama_data:/root/.ollama
# Uncomment if you have an NVIDIA GPU
# deploy:
# resources:
# reservations:
# devices:
# - driver: nvidia
# count: 1
# capabilities: [gpu]
volumes:
ollama_data:
Model Recommendations
Caution
REMINDER: Only
gpt-4.1was ever supported prior tov0.6.5-alpha*builds!
👉 Help us by taking a structured approach to your testing of the models mentioned below. 🙏
For Chat Assistant
The AI assistant needs to understand financial context and perform function/tool calling:
Cloud:
- Best:
gpt-4.1orgpt-5- Most reliable, best function calling - Good:
anthropic/claude-4.5-sonnet- Excellent reasoning - Budget:
google/gemini-2.5-flash- Fast and affordable
Local:
- Best:
qwen3-30b- Strong function calling and reasoning (24GB+ VRAM, 14GB at 3bit quantised ) - Good:
openai/gpt-oss-20b- Solid performance (12GB VRAM) - Budget:
qwen3-8b,llama3.1-8b- Minimal hardware (8GB VRAM), still supports tool calling
For Auto-Categorization
Transaction categorization doesn't require function calling:
Cloud:
- Best: Same as chat -
gpt-4.1orgpt-5 - Budget:
gpt-4o-mini- Much cheaper, still very accurate
Local:
- Any model that works for chat will work for categorization
- This is less demanding than chat, so smaller models may suffice
- Some models don't support structured outputs, please validate when using.
For Merchant Detection
Similar requirements to categorization:
Cloud:
- Same recommendations as auto-categorization
Local:
- Same recommendations as auto-categorization
Configuration via Settings UI
For self-hosted deployments, you can configure AI settings through the web interface:
- Go to Settings → Self-Hosting
- Scroll to the AI Provider section
- Configure:
- OpenAI Access Token - Your API key
- OpenAI URI Base - Custom endpoint (leave blank for OpenAI)
- OpenAI Model - Model name (required for custom endpoints)
Note: Environment variables take precedence over UI settings. When an env var is set, the corresponding UI field is disabled.
External AI Assistant
Instead of using the built-in LLM (which calls OpenAI or a local model directly), you can delegate chat to an external AI agent. The agent receives the conversation, can call back to Sure's financial data via MCP, and streams a response.
This is useful when:
- You have a custom AI agent with domain knowledge, memory, or personality
- You want to use a non-OpenAI-compatible model (the agent translates)
- You want to keep LLM credentials and logic outside Sure entirely
Important
Set
ASSISTANT_TYPE=externalto route all users to the external agent. Without it, routing falls back to each family'sassistant_typeDB column (configurable per-family in the Settings UI), then defaults to"builtin". If you want a global override that applies to every family regardless of their UI setting, set the env var. If you only want specific families to use the external agent, skip the env var and configure it per-family in Settings.
Note
The external assistant handles chat only. Auto-categorization and merchant detection still use the OpenAI-compatible provider (
OPENAI_ACCESS_TOKEN). See Architecture: Two AI Pipelines for details.
How It Works
- User sends a message in the Sure chat UI
- Sure sends the conversation to your agent's API endpoint (OpenAI chat completions format)
- Your agent processes it using whatever LLM, tools, or context it needs
- Your agent can call Sure's
/mcpendpoint for financial data (accounts, transactions, balance sheet, holdings) - Your agent streams the response back to Sure via Server-Sent Events (SSE)
The agent's API must be OpenAI chat completions compatible: accept POST with a messages array, return SSE with delta.content chunks.
Configuration
Configure via the UI or environment variables:
Settings UI:
- Go to Settings -> Self-Hosting
- Set Assistant type to "External (remote agent)"
- Enter the Endpoint URL and API Token from your agent provider
- Optionally set an Agent ID if the provider hosts multiple agents
Environment variables:
ASSISTANT_TYPE=external # Global override (or set per-family in UI)
EXTERNAL_ASSISTANT_URL=https://your-agent/v1/chat/completions
EXTERNAL_ASSISTANT_TOKEN=your-api-token
EXTERNAL_ASSISTANT_AGENT_ID=main # Optional, defaults to "main"
EXTERNAL_ASSISTANT_SESSION_KEY=agent:main:main # Optional, for session persistence
EXTERNAL_ASSISTANT_ALLOWED_EMAILS=user@example.com # Optional, comma-separated allowlist
When environment variables are set, the corresponding UI fields are disabled (env takes precedence).
MCP Callback Endpoint
Sure exposes a Model Context Protocol (MCP) endpoint at /mcp so your external agent can call back and query financial data. This is how the agent accesses accounts, transactions, balance sheets, and other user data.
Protocol: JSON-RPC 2.0 over HTTP POST
Authentication: Bearer token via Authorization header
Environment variables:
MCP_API_TOKEN=your-secret-token # Bearer token the agent sends to authenticate
MCP_USER_EMAIL=user@example.com # Email of the Sure user the agent acts as
The agent must send requests to https://your-sure-instance/mcp with:
Authorization: Bearer <MCP_API_TOKEN>
Content-Type: application/json
Supported methods:
| Method | Description |
|---|---|
initialize |
Handshake, returns server info and capabilities |
tools/list |
Lists available tools with names, descriptions, and input schemas |
tools/call |
Calls a specific tool by name with arguments |
Available tools (exposed via tools/list):
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
get_accounts |
Retrieve account information |
get_transactions |
Query transaction history |
get_holdings |
Investment holdings data |
get_balance_sheet |
Current financial position |
get_income_statement |
Income and expenses |
import_bank_statement |
Import bank statement data |
search_family_files |
Search uploaded documents |
Example: list tools
curl -X POST https://your-sure-instance/mcp \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $MCP_API_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"tools/list"}'
Example: call a tool
curl -X POST https://your-sure-instance/mcp \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $MCP_API_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":2,"method":"tools/call","params":{"name":"get_accounts","arguments":{}}}'
OpenClaw Gateway Example
OpenClaw is an AI agent gateway that exposes agents as OpenAI-compatible endpoints. If your agent runs behind OpenClaw, configure it like this:
ASSISTANT_TYPE=external
EXTERNAL_ASSISTANT_URL=http://your-openclaw-host:18789/v1/chat/completions
EXTERNAL_ASSISTANT_TOKEN=your-gateway-token
EXTERNAL_ASSISTANT_AGENT_ID=your-agent-name
OpenClaw setup requirements:
- The gateway must have
chatCompletions.enabled: truein its config - The agent's MCP config must point to Sure's
/mcpendpoint with the correctMCP_API_TOKEN - The URL format is always
/v1/chat/completions(OpenAI-compatible)
Kubernetes in-cluster example (agent in a different namespace):
# URL uses Kubernetes DNS: <service>.<namespace>.svc.cluster.local:<port>
EXTERNAL_ASSISTANT_URL=http://my-agent.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local:18789/v1/chat/completions
Giving the agent a long-term memory of its own
An external agent can do more than answer questions about the current balance: with its own repository behind it, it can maintain a document-backed history of a family's wealth, where every figure traces back to the statement it came from.
That is a two-install shape — Sure as the system of record, the agent harness as the model and the compiler — rather than a feature inside Sure. Sure exposes a set of preview MCP tools for it (the Statement Vault, coverage gaps, and valuations that require a source citation).
See Wealth history with an external agent harness for which side owns what, and the blueprint it implements.
Security with Pipelock
When Pipelock is enabled (pipelock.enabled=true in Helm, or the pipelock service in Docker Compose), all traffic between Sure and the external agent is scanned:
- Outbound (Sure -> agent): routed through Pipelock's forward proxy via
HTTPS_PROXY - Inbound (agent -> Sure /mcp): routed through Pipelock's MCP reverse proxy (port 8889)
Pipelock scans for prompt injection, DLP violations, and tool poisoning. The external agent does not need Pipelock installed. Sure's Pipelock handles both directions.
If you need audit evidence, configure Pipelock's flight recorder as described in Pipelock signed action receipts. pipelock.enabled=true gives scanning; receipts require mounted evidence storage plus a receipt-signing key.
NO_PROXY behavior (Helm/Kubernetes only): The Helm chart's env template sets NO_PROXY to include .svc.cluster.local and other internal domains. This means in-cluster agent URLs (like http://agent.namespace.svc.cluster.local:18789) bypass the forward proxy and go directly. If your agent is in-cluster, its traffic won't be forward-proxy scanned (but MCP callbacks from the agent are still scanned by the reverse proxy). Docker Compose deployments use a different NO_PROXY set; check your compose file for the exact values.
mcpToolPolicy note: The Helm chart's pipelock.mcpToolPolicy.enabled defaults to false. Pipelock rejects an enabled tool policy with no rules, so the chart ships it off by default. To turn it on, define at least one rule and set enabled: true:
# Helm values
pipelock:
mcpToolPolicy:
enabled: true
action: warn
rules:
- name: example
toolPattern: "^shell$"
action: block
See the Pipelock documentation for tool policy configuration details.
Network Policies (Kubernetes)
If you use Kubernetes NetworkPolicies (and you should), both Sure and the agent's namespace need rules to allow traffic in both directions.
Warning
Port number gotcha: Kubernetes network policies evaluate after kube-proxy DNAT. This means egress rules must use the pod's
targetPort, not the service port. If your agent's Service maps port 18789 to targetPort 18790, the network policy must allow port 18790.
Sure namespace egress (Sure calling the agent):
# Allow Sure -> agent namespace
- to:
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
kubernetes.io/metadata.name: agent-namespace
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 18790 # targetPort, not service port!
Sure namespace ingress (agent calling Sure's pipelock MCP reverse proxy):
# Allow agent -> Sure pipelock MCP reverse proxy
- from:
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
kubernetes.io/metadata.name: agent-namespace
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 8889
Agent namespace needs the reverse: egress to Sure on port 8889, ingress from Sure on its listening port.
Access Control
Use EXTERNAL_ASSISTANT_ALLOWED_EMAILS to restrict which users can use the external assistant. When set, only users whose email matches the comma-separated list will see the AI chat. When blank, all users can access it.
Docker Compose Example
x-rails-env: &rails_env
ASSISTANT_TYPE: external
EXTERNAL_ASSISTANT_URL: https://your-agent/v1/chat/completions
EXTERNAL_ASSISTANT_TOKEN: your-api-token
MCP_API_TOKEN: your-mcp-token # For agent callback
MCP_USER_EMAIL: user@example.com # User the agent acts as
Or configure the assistant via the Settings UI after startup (MCP env vars are still required for callback).
Assistant Architecture
Sure's AI assistant system uses a modular architecture that allows different assistant implementations to be plugged in based on configuration. This section explains the architecture for contributors who want to understand or extend the system.
Overview
The assistant system evolved from a monolithic class to a module-based architecture with a registry pattern. This allows Sure to support multiple assistant types (builtin, external) and makes it easy to add new implementations.
Key benefits:
- Extensible: Add new assistant types without modifying existing code
- Configurable: Choose assistant type per family or globally
- Isolated: Each implementation has its own logic and dependencies
- Testable: Implementations are independent and can be tested separately
Component Hierarchy
Assistant Module
The main entry point for all assistant operations. Located in app/models/assistant.rb.
Key methods:
| Method | Description |
|---|---|
.for_chat(chat) |
Returns the appropriate assistant instance for a chat |
.config_for(chat) |
Returns configuration for builtin assistants |
.available_types |
Lists all registered assistant types |
.function_classes |
Returns all available function/tool classes |
Example usage:
# Get an assistant for a chat
assistant = Assistant.for_chat(chat)
# Respond to a message
assistant.respond_to(message)
Assistant::Base
Abstract base class that all assistant implementations inherit from. Located in app/models/assistant/base.rb.
Contract:
- Must implement
respond_to(message)instance method - Includes
Assistant::Broadcastablefor real-time updates - Receives the
chatobject in the initializer
Example implementation:
class Assistant::MyCustom < Assistant::Base
def respond_to(message)
# Your custom logic here
assistant_message = AssistantMessage.new(chat: chat, content: "Response")
assistant_message.save!
end
end
Assistant::Builtin
The default implementation that uses the configured OpenAI-compatible LLM provider. Located in app/models/assistant/builtin.rb.
Features:
- Uses
Assistant::Providedfor LLM provider selection - Uses
Assistant::Configurablefor system prompts and function configuration - Supports function calling via
Assistant::FunctionToolCaller - Streams responses in real-time
Key methods:
| Method | Description |
|---|---|
.for_chat(chat) |
Creates a new builtin assistant with config |
#respond_to(message) |
Processes a message using the LLM |
Assistant::External
Implementation for delegating chat to a remote AI agent. Located in app/models/assistant/external.rb.
Features:
- Sends conversation to external agent via OpenAI-compatible API
- Agent calls back to Sure's
/mcpendpoint for financial data - Supports access control via email allowlist
- Streams responses from the agent
Configuration:
config = Assistant::External.config
# => #<struct url="...", token="...", agent_id="...", session_key="...">
Registry Pattern
The Assistant module uses a registry to map type names to implementation classes:
REGISTRY = {
"builtin" => Assistant::Builtin,
"external" => Assistant::External
}.freeze
Type selection logic:
- Check
ENV["ASSISTANT_TYPE"](global override) - Check
chat.user.family.assistant_type(per-family setting) - Default to
"builtin"
Example:
# Global override
ENV["ASSISTANT_TYPE"] = "external"
Assistant.for_chat(chat) # => Assistant::External instance
# Per-family setting
family.update(assistant_type: "external")
Assistant.for_chat(chat) # => Assistant::External instance
# Default
Assistant.for_chat(chat) # => Assistant::Builtin instance
Function Registry
The Assistant.function_classes method centralizes all available financial tools:
def self.function_classes
[
Function::GetTransactions,
Function::GetAccounts,
Function::GetHoldings,
Function::GetBalanceSheet,
Function::GetIncomeStatement,
Function::ImportBankStatement,
Function::SearchFamilyFiles
]
end
These functions are:
- Used by builtin assistants for LLM function calling
- Exposed via the MCP endpoint for external agents
- Defined in
app/models/assistant/function/
Adding a New Assistant Type
To add a custom assistant implementation:
1. Create the implementation class
# app/models/assistant/my_custom.rb
class Assistant::MyCustom < Assistant::Base
class << self
def for_chat(chat)
new(chat)
end
end
def respond_to(message)
# Your implementation here
# Must create and save an AssistantMessage
assistant_message = AssistantMessage.new(
chat: chat,
content: "My custom response"
)
assistant_message.save!
end
end
2. Register the implementation
# app/models/assistant.rb
REGISTRY = {
"builtin" => Assistant::Builtin,
"external" => Assistant::External,
"my_custom" => Assistant::MyCustom
}.freeze
3. Add validation
# app/models/family.rb
ASSISTANT_TYPES = %w[builtin external my_custom].freeze
4. Use the new type
# Global override
ASSISTANT_TYPE=my_custom
# Or set per-family in the database
family.update(assistant_type: "my_custom")
Integration Points
Pipelock Integration
For external assistants, Pipelock can scan traffic:
- Outbound: Sure -> agent (via
HTTPS_PROXY) - Inbound: Agent -> Sure /mcp (via MCP reverse proxy on port 8889)
See the External AI Assistant and Pipelock documentation for configuration.
OpenClaw/WebSocket Support
The Assistant::External implementation currently uses HTTP streaming. Future implementations could use WebSocket connections via OpenClaw or other gateways.
Example future implementation:
class Assistant::WebSocket < Assistant::Base
def respond_to(message)
# Connect via WebSocket
# Stream bidirectional communication
# Handle tool calls via MCP
end
end
Register it in the REGISTRY and add to Family::ASSISTANT_TYPES to activate.
AI Cache Management
Sure caches AI-generated results (like auto-categorization and merchant detection) to avoid redundant API calls and costs. However, there are situations where you may want to clear this cache.
What is the AI Cache?
When AI rules process transactions, Sure stores:
- Enrichment records: Which attributes were set by AI (category, merchant, etc.)
- Attribute locks: Prevents rules from re-processing already-handled transactions
This caching means:
- Transactions won't be sent to the LLM repeatedly
- Your API costs are minimized
- Processing is faster on subsequent rule runs
When to Reset the AI Cache
You might want to reset the cache when:
- Switching LLM models: Different models may produce better categorizations
- Improving prompts: After system updates with better prompts
- Fixing miscategorizations: When AI made systematic errors
- Testing: During development or evaluation of AI features
Caution
Resetting the AI cache will cause all transactions to be re-processed by AI rules on the next run. This will incur API costs if using a cloud provider.
How to Reset the AI Cache
Via UI (Recommended):
- Go to Settings → Rules
- Click the menu button (three dots)
- Select Reset AI cache
- Confirm the action
The cache is cleared asynchronously in the background. You'll see a confirmation message when the process starts.
Automatic Reset: The AI cache is automatically cleared for all users when the OpenAI model setting is changed. This ensures that the new model processes transactions fresh.
What Happens When Cache is Reset
- AI-locked attributes are unlocked: Transactions can be re-enriched
- AI enrichment records are deleted: The history of AI changes is cleared
- User edits are preserved: If you manually changed a category after AI set it, your change is kept
Cost Implications
Before resetting the cache, consider:
| Scenario | Approximate Cost |
|---|---|
| 100 transactions | $0.05-0.20 |
| 1,000 transactions | $0.50-2.00 |
| 10,000 transactions | $5.00-20.00 |
Costs vary by model. Use gpt-4o-mini for lower costs.
Tips to minimize costs:
- Use narrow rule filters before running AI actions
- Reset cache only when necessary
- Consider using local LLMs for bulk re-processing
Observability with Langfuse
Sure includes built-in support for Langfuse, an open-source LLM observability platform.
What is Langfuse?
Langfuse helps you:
- Track all LLM requests and responses
- Monitor costs per request
- Measure response latency
- Debug failed requests
- Analyze usage patterns
- Optimize prompts based on real data
Setup
-
Create a free account at Langfuse Cloud or self-host Langfuse
-
Get your API keys from the Langfuse dashboard
-
Configure Sure:
LANGFUSE_PUBLIC_KEY=pk-lf-... LANGFUSE_SECRET_KEY=sk-lf-... LANGFUSE_HOST=https://cloud.langfuse.com # or your self-hosted URL -
Restart Sure
All LLM operations will now be logged to Langfuse, including:
- Chat messages and responses
- Auto-categorization requests
- Merchant detection
- Token usage and costs
- Response times
Langfuse Features in Sure
- Automatic tracing: Every LLM call is automatically traced
- Session tracking: Chat sessions are tracked with a unique session ID
- User anonymization: User IDs are hashed before sending to Langfuse
- Cost tracking: Token usage is logged for cost analysis
- Error tracking: Failed requests are logged with error details
Viewing Traces
- Go to your Langfuse dashboard
- Navigate to Traces
- You'll see traces for:
openai.chat_response- Chat assistant interactionsopenai.auto_categorize- Transaction categorizationopenai.auto_detect_merchants- Merchant detection
Privacy Considerations
What's sent to Langfuse:
- Prompts and responses
- Model names
- Token counts
- Timestamps
- Session IDs
- Hashed user IDs (not actual user data)
What's NOT sent:
- User email addresses
- User names
- Unhashed user IDs
- Account credentials
For maximum privacy: Self-host Langfuse on your own infrastructure.
Testing and Evaluation
Manual Testing
Test your AI configuration:
-
Go to the Chat interface in Sure
-
Try these test prompts:
- "Show me my total spending this month"
- "What are my top 5 spending categories?"
- "How much do I have in savings?"
-
Verify:
- Responses are relevant
- Function calls work (you should see "Analyzing your data..." briefly)
- Numbers match your actual data
Automated Evaluation
Sure doesn't currently include automated evals, but you can build them using Langfuse:
- Collect baseline responses: Run test prompts and save responses
- Create evaluation dataset: Use Langfuse datasets feature
- Run evaluations: Test new models/prompts against the dataset
- Compare results: Use Langfuse's comparison tools
Benchmarking Models
To compare models for your use case:
-
Speed Test:
- Send the same prompt to different models
- Measure time to first token (TTFT)
- Measure overall response time
-
Quality Test:
- Create a set of 10-20 realistic financial questions
- Get responses from each model
- Manually rate accuracy and helpfulness
-
Cost Test:
- Calculate cost per interaction based on token usage
- Factor in your expected usage volume
- Consider speed vs. cost tradeoffs
Example Evaluation Queries
Good test queries that exercise different capabilities:
- Simple retrieval: "What's my checking account balance?"
- Aggregation: "Total spending on restaurants last month?"
- Comparison: "Am I spending more or less than last year?"
- Analysis: "What are my biggest expenses this quarter?"
- Forecasting: "Based on my spending, when will I reach $10k savings?"
Cost Considerations
Cloud Costs
Typical costs for OpenAI (as of early 2025):
- gpt-4.1: ~$5-15 per 1M input tokens, ~$15-60 per 1M output tokens
- gpt-5: ~2-3x more expensive than gpt-4.1
- gpt-4o-mini: ~$0.15 per 1M input tokens (very cheap)
Typical usage:
- Chat message: 500-2000 tokens (input) + 100-500 tokens (output)
- Auto-categorization: 1000-3000 tokens per 25 transactions
- Cost per chat message: $0.01-0.05 for gpt-4.1
Optimization tips:
- Use
gpt-4o-minifor categorization - Use Langfuse to identify expensive prompts
- Cache results when possible
- Consider local LLMs for high-volume operations
Local Costs
One-time costs:
- GPU hardware: $500-2000+ depending on VRAM needs
- Setup time: 2-8 hours
Ongoing costs:
- Electricity: ~$0.10-0.50 per hour of GPU usage
- Maintenance: Occasional updates and monitoring
Break-even analysis:
If you process 10,000 messages/month:
- Cloud (gpt-4.1): ~$200-500/month
- Local (amortized): ~$50-100/month after hardware cost
- Break-even: 6-12 months depending on hardware cost
Recommendation: Start with cloud, switch to local if costs exceed $100-200/month.
Hybrid Approach
You can mix providers:
# Example: Use local for categorization, cloud for chat
# Categorization (high volume, lower complexity)
CATEGORIZATION_PROVIDER=ollama
CATEGORIZATION_MODEL=gemma2:7b
# Chat (lower volume, higher complexity)
CHAT_PROVIDER=openai
CHAT_MODEL=gpt-4.1
Note: Sure currently uses a single provider for all operations, but this could be customized.
Troubleshooting
"Messages is invalid" Error
Symptom: Cannot start a chat, see validation error
Cause: Using a custom provider (like Ollama) without setting OPENAI_MODEL
Fix:
# Make sure all three are set for custom providers
OPENAI_ACCESS_TOKEN=ollama-local # Any non-empty value
OPENAI_URI_BASE=http://localhost:11434/v1
OPENAI_MODEL=your-model-name # REQUIRED!
Model Not Found
Symptom: Error about model not being available
Cloud: Check that you're using a valid model name for your provider
Local: Make sure you've pulled the model:
ollama list # See what's installed
ollama pull model-name # Install a model
"Fixed prompt tokens exceed context budget"
Symptom: Auto-categorization or merchant detection fails immediately with an error like:
Fixed prompt tokens (2108) exceed context budget (1280)
Cause: Sure computes the usable prompt budget as:
context_window - max_response_tokens - system_prompt_reserve
The defaults are conservative:
LLM_CONTEXT_WINDOW=2048LLM_MAX_RESPONSE_TOKENS=512LLM_SYSTEM_PROMPT_RESERVE=256
That leaves 1280 input tokens. On local or custom models, the fixed prompt can already exceed that budget once you include Sure's instructions, category taxonomy, and schema payloads.
Fix:
LLM_CONTEXT_WINDOW=8192
Then restart both web and worker so the new env var is loaded. If you are using Docker Compose, make sure your compose file forwards LLM_CONTEXT_WINDOW into the containers.
Slow Responses
Symptom: Long wait times for AI responses
Cloud:
- Switch to a faster model (e.g.,
gpt-4o-miniorgemini-2.0-flash-exp) - Check your internet connection
- Verify provider status page
Local:
- Check GPU utilization (should be near 100% during inference)
- Try a smaller model
- Ensure you're using GPU, not CPU
- Check for thermal throttling
- If you see
Net::ReadTimeoutafter fixing the context budget, raiseOPENAI_REQUEST_TIMEOUT(for example180)
No Provider Available
Symptom: "Provider not found" or similar error
Fix:
- Check
OPENAI_ACCESS_TOKENis set - For custom providers, verify
OPENAI_URI_BASEandOPENAI_MODEL - Restart Sure after changing environment variables
- Check logs for specific error messages
"Failed to generate response" with External Assistant
Symptom: Chat shows "Failed to generate response" when expecting the external assistant
Check in order:
-
Is external routing active? Sure uses external mode when
ASSISTANT_TYPE=externalis set as an env var, OR when the family'sassistant_typeis set to "external" in Settings. Check what the pod sees:kubectl exec deploy/sure-web -c rails -- env | grep ASSISTANT_TYPE kubectl exec deploy/sure-worker -c sidekiq -- env | grep ASSISTANT_TYPEIf the env var is unset, check the family setting in the database or Settings UI.
-
Can Sure reach the agent? Test from inside the worker pod (use
sh -cso the env var expands inside the pod, not locally):kubectl exec deploy/sure-worker -c sidekiq -- \ sh -c 'curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $EXTERNAL_ASSISTANT_TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d "{\"model\":\"test\",\"messages\":[{\"role\":\"user\",\"content\":\"ping\"}]}" \ $EXTERNAL_ASSISTANT_URL'- Exit code 7 (connection refused): Network policy is blocking. Check egress rules, and remember to use the
targetPort, not the service port. - HTTP 401/403: Token mismatch between Sure's
EXTERNAL_ASSISTANT_TOKENand the agent's expected token. - HTTP 404: Wrong URL path. Must be
/v1/chat/completions.
- Exit code 7 (connection refused): Network policy is blocking. Check egress rules, and remember to use the
-
Check worker logs for the actual error:
kubectl logs deploy/sure-worker -c sidekiq --tail=50 | grep -i "external\|assistant\|error" -
If using Pipelock: Check the Pipelock deployment logs. A crashed Pipelock proxy can block outbound requests:
kubectl logs deploy/sure-pipelock --tail=20
High Costs
Symptom: Unexpected bills from cloud provider
Analysis:
- Check Langfuse for usage patterns
- Look for unusually long conversations
- Check if you're using an expensive model
Optimization:
- Switch to cheaper model for categorization
- Consider local LLM for high-volume tasks
- Implement rate limiting if needed
- Review and optimize system prompts
Advanced Topics
Custom System Prompts
The builtin AI assistant uses a system prompt that defines its behavior. The prompt is defined in app/models/assistant/configurable.rb. This does not apply to external assistants, which manage their own prompts.
To customize:
- Fork the repository
- Edit the
default_instructionsmethod - Rebuild and deploy
What you can customize:
- Tone and personality
- Response format
- Rules and constraints
- Domain expertise
Function Calling
The assistant uses OpenAI's function calling (tool use) to access user data:
Available functions:
get_transactions- Retrieve transaction historyget_accounts- Get account informationget_holdings- Investment holdings dataget_balance_sheet- Current financial positionget_income_statement- Income and expensesimport_bank_statement- Import bank statement datasearch_family_files- Search uploaded documents
These are defined in app/models/assistant/function/.
Vector Store (Document Search)
Sure's AI assistant can search documents that have been uploaded to a family's vault. Under the hood, documents are indexed in a vector store so the assistant can retrieve relevant passages when answering questions (Retrieval-Augmented Generation).
How It Works
- When a user uploads a document to their family vault, it is automatically pushed to the configured vector store.
- When the assistant needs financial context from uploaded files, it calls the
search_family_filesfunction. - The vector store returns the most relevant passages, which the assistant uses to answer the question.
Supported Backends
| Backend | Status | Best For | Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI (default) | ready | Cloud deployments, zero setup | OPENAI_ACCESS_TOKEN |
| Pgvector | ready | Self-hosted, full data privacy | PostgreSQL with pgvector extension + embedding model |
| Qdrant | scaffolded | Self-hosted, dedicated vector DB | Running Qdrant instance |
Configuration
OpenAI (Default)
No extra configuration is needed. If you already have OPENAI_ACCESS_TOKEN set for the AI assistant, document search works automatically. OpenAI manages chunking, embedding, and retrieval.
# Already set for AI chat - document search uses the same token
OPENAI_ACCESS_TOKEN=sk-proj-...
Pgvector (Self-Hosted)
Use PostgreSQL's pgvector extension for fully local document search. All data stays on your infrastructure.
Requirements:
- Use the
pgvector/pgvector:pg16Docker image instead ofpostgres:16(drop-in replacement) - An embedding model served via an OpenAI-compatible
/v1/embeddingsendpoint (e.g. Ollama withnomic-embed-text) - Run the migration with
VECTOR_STORE_PROVIDER=pgvectorto create thevector_store_chunkstable
# Required
VECTOR_STORE_PROVIDER=pgvector
# Embedding model configuration
EMBEDDING_MODEL=nomic-embed-text # Default: nomic-embed-text
EMBEDDING_DIMENSIONS=1024 # Default: 1024 (must match your model)
EMBEDDING_URI_BASE=http://ollama:11434/v1 # Falls back to OPENAI_URI_BASE if not set
EMBEDDING_ACCESS_TOKEN= # Falls back to OPENAI_ACCESS_TOKEN if not set
If you are using Ollama (as in compose.example.ai.yml), pull the embedding model:
docker compose exec ollama ollama pull nomic-embed-text
Qdrant (Self-Hosted)
Caution
Only
OpenAIhas been implemented!
Use a dedicated Qdrant vector database:
VECTOR_STORE_PROVIDER=qdrant
QDRANT_URL=http://localhost:6333 # Default if not set
QDRANT_API_KEY=your-api-key # Optional, for authenticated instances
Docker Compose example:
services:
sure:
environment:
- VECTOR_STORE_PROVIDER=qdrant
- QDRANT_URL=http://qdrant:6333
depends_on:
- qdrant
qdrant:
image: qdrant/qdrant:latest
ports:
- "6333:6333"
volumes:
- qdrant_data:/qdrant/storage
volumes:
qdrant_data:
Note: The Qdrant adapter is currently a skeleton. A future release will add full support including collection management and embedding configuration.
Verifying the Configuration
You can check whether a vector store is properly configured from the Rails console:
VectorStore.configured? # => true / false
VectorStore.adapter # => #<VectorStore::Openai:...>
VectorStore.adapter.class.name # => "VectorStore::Openai"
Supported File Types
The following file extensions are supported for document upload and search:
.pdf, .txt, .md, .csv, .json, .xml, .html, .css, .js, .rb, .py, .docx, .pptx, .xlsx, .yaml, .yml, .log, .sh
Privacy Notes
- OpenAI backend: Document content is sent to OpenAI's API for indexing and search. The same privacy considerations as the AI chat apply.
- Pgvector / Qdrant backends: All data stays on your infrastructure. No external API calls are made for document search.
Multi-Model Setup
Currently not supported out of the box, but you could:
- Create multiple provider instances
- Add routing logic to select provider based on task
- Update controllers to specify which provider to use
Rate Limiting
To prevent abuse or runaway costs:
- Use Rack::Attack (already included)
- Configure in
config/initializers/rack_attack.rb - Limit requests per user or globally
Example:
# Limit chat creation to 10 per minute per user
throttle('chats/create', limit: 10, period: 1.minute) do |req|
req.session[:user_id] if req.path == '/chats' && req.post?
end
Resources
- OpenAI Documentation
- Ollama Documentation
- OpenRouter Documentation
- Langfuse Documentation
- Sure GitHub Repository
Support
For issues with AI features:
- Check this documentation first
- Search existing GitHub issues
- Open a new issue with:
- Your configuration (redact API keys!)
- Error messages
- Steps to reproduce
- Expected vs. actual behavior
Last Updated: March 2026