mirror of
https://github.com/we-promise/sure.git
synced 2026-09-09 00:24:15 +00:00
Claude
f5ba646878
All four checked against the repo's own conventions before applying. Mirror the check constraint as a model validation. Assigning reconciled_by_statement without reconciled_at raised StatementInvalid rather than a validation error. CLAUDE.md Convention 5 asks for exactly this pairing -- the constraint in the database, an ActiveRecord validation for form-friendly errors. Stop hijacking the pending-scope comment. The reconciliation scopes were inserted directly under "Pending transaction scopes", so that header read as documentation for them and the provider note below read as a continuation of reconciled_by. Given the reconciliation scopes their own header. Use OpenStruct for the provider response double, per "Always prefer OpenStruct when creating mock instances". Verified OpenStruct.new(success?: true) responds to success?, and ostruct is already a dependency used elsewhere in test/. Make the migration lock-safe. entries is the largest table in the app: both indexes now build concurrently, and the check constraint is added unvalidated then validated separately so VALIDATE takes only SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE instead of holding ACCESS EXCLUSIVE for a full scan. This follows existing practice -- 13 migrations already use disable_ddl_transaction! and 11 use algorithm: :concurrently, with add_offline_reason_to_securities combining add_column and a concurrent index in one migration exactly like this. The suggested follow-up migration for validation was not needed: validating in the same non- transactional migration gets the same lock behavior without a second file, and the repo has no validate: false precedent in 400 migrations. schema.rb is unchanged: a validated constraint and a concurrently-built index dump identically. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KvWSJotDiqP6qSR7qEiC8Q