mirror of
https://github.com/we-promise/sure.git
synced 2026-09-05 06:41:08 +00:00
bf5ceff26926b63a07b0ae4ac1ecccdddbbf7c8b
3278
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
bf5ceff269 |
Fix flaky sign_out teardown in six test suites (#3208)
Six suites (passkey, MFA, SnapTrade, categorize, onboarding and the Active Storage authorization integration tests) share a sign_out helper that deletes the user's sessions through the controller, one HTTP request per session, iterating in unspecified order. The moment the loop deletes the session the test itself is signed in with, every later request in the loop is unauthenticated and silently deletes nothing, so whichever sessions happen to sort after it survive. The sessions fixture belongs to the same user these suites use, so a surviving fixture row then fails every assertion that expects the user to have no sessions. Row order usually favors the fixture, which is why the suites usually pass. Under parallel CI they fail a few times a week, always in this file family, always with the fixture session as the leftover. Forcing newest-first order reproduces it deterministically on current main: ten of the fifteen passkey tests fail. Teardown hygiene is not the behavior under test, so the helpers now destroy the sessions directly, which no order can break. All six suites run green three times in a row. |
||
|
|
2fdb9ee175 |
Plaid: add accounts to an existing connection (#3199)
* feat: add accounts to existing Plaid items * fix: harden Plaid account addition * fix: guard Plaid follow-up sync retries * fix: use debug log for Plaid retry exhaustion |
||
|
|
547ad7e69a |
Update CHANGELOG with recent changes and fixes
Signed-off-by: Juan José Mata <juanjo.mata@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
5becbb50f9 |
Bump version to next iteration after v0.7.4-alpha.11 release (#3196)
* Bump version to next iteration after v0.7.4-alpha.11 release * Kick off the new release --------- Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Juan José Mata <jjmata@jjmata.com> |
||
|
|
0275fc74be | Regenerate schema for Rails 8.1 (#3194) | ||
|
|
2abce5f5b7 |
Verify PDF support with a synthetic health probe (#3191)
* Add synthetic PDF health checks * Require exact marker in PDF health probes * Report PDF health paths separately * Refactor application code * Remove unrelated schema dump changes * Simplify synthetic PDF validation --------- Signed-off-by: Juan José Mata <juanjo.mata@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
79a175806e |
Fix SimpleFIN balances-only liability signs (#3187)
* Fix SimpleFIN balances-only liability signs * Fix SimpleFIN balances-only liability edge cases * Fix importer test helper indentation --------- Co-authored-by: Marty <marty0x@github.com> |
||
|
|
4930aacdb8 |
feat: create merchant inline from transaction detail (#3106)
* feat: create merchant inline from transaction detail Add a searchable "create or select" merchant combobox (DS::MerchantSelect, mirroring the existing DS::TagSelect pattern) so a new FamilyMerchant can be created directly from the transaction detail and new-transaction forms, instead of requiring a trip to Settings > Merchants first. FamilyMerchantsController#create now also responds to JSON so the combobox can create-and-select a merchant without a full page reload. * fix: address PR review feedback on merchant inline creation - Handle Turbo validation failures in FamilyMerchantsController#create (missing format.turbo_stream branch raised ActionController::UnknownFormat) - Guard connect() so disabled merchant selectors (no menu target) don't throw - Select the exact match (or block form submission) on Enter when the create row is hidden - Catch network/parse failures in createMerchant and show an error - Localize the fallback "could not create merchant" error message - Move the create button/error text outside the listbox and add aria-controls for accessibility - Align create-option avatar size with the selected-value display Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: keep created merchant option inside the listbox, move logo URL logic to component - Add a dedicated listbox target and insert newly created merchant options inside it (previously landed outside role="listbox" after the create button was moved out in the prior review-fix commit) - Move selected-merchant logo URL transformation out of the template into DS::MerchantSelect#selected_merchant_logo_url Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: address maintainer review feedback on merchant inline creation - Drop the explicit format.turbo_stream branch in the merchant creation failure path: respond_to's turbo_stream matching forces the response Content-Type to text/vnd.turbo-stream.html before the block runs, so render :new, formats: [:html] only changed template lookup, not the Content-Type. Turbo's client then received a turbo-stream response with no <turbo-stream> tags and silently did nothing. Leaving turbo_stream undeclared lets Rails negotiate down to format.html, which renders :new with the correct text/html type. - Add truncate/shrink-0 classes to the merchant option partial's name and avatar spans so they match the selected-value display once updateSelectionDisplay clones them into the trigger button. - Add a regression test simulating a Turbo form submission (Accept: turbo-stream, text/html) against a duplicate merchant name. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Gerald <248542187+gfr-free@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
f05559cdc1 |
docs: add Hostim.dev as a one-click hosting option (#2567)
* Add Hostim.dev as a hosting option * docs: note storage volume and db:prepare in manual setup |
||
|
|
74bb980271 |
feat(goals): a reserve measured in months of spending, not a fixed sum (#3180)
* feat(goals): a reserve measured in months of spending, not a fixed sum "Six months of expenses" is the way people actually describe an emergency fund, and it is a moving number: what covered six months last January does not cover six months today. A reserve pinned to a figure typed once drifts quietly out of date, and the drift always runs the wrong way — the bar reads full while the cover shrinks. `target_amount` stays the single source of truth, rewritten monthly by RefreshMaintainedGoalTargetsJob. That is the whole architectural decision here. An `effective_target_amount` would have been the obvious shape and the wrong one: `remaining_amount`, `progress_percent`, `Goal.summary_for`, the ring, the card and every future caller would each have had to learn which target to read. None of them change. The job refuses to write more often than it writes, on purpose: - a family with no spending history yet computes a floor of zero, which would both violate the `target_amount > 0` constraint and read to the user as "your reserve is complete". The previous target stands. - a figure identical to the current one is not rewritten, so a reserve does not collect a fresh updated_at every month for nothing. - a write that fails validation leaves the target alone and is recorded through DebugLogEntry, not just the application log: a reserve frozen at a stale floor is invisible to the user, who has no reason to suspect the number stopped moving. The job reads the family's spending, not a member's view. IncomeStatement falls back to Current.user when nobody says otherwise, which in a background job is nobody — so the scope is the whole family, and the number is the same whoever is looking. That is deliberate, and matches how the rollover chain had to be pinned. `target_months` is refused outside a months-mode reserve rather than tolerated: a number nothing reads would sit there looking meaningful, and the job would skip it for reasons no one could see. schema.rb is hand-edited again — verified against a real migration on a throwaway database, structures identical. The dumper on this Rails version also rewrites every check-constraint cast, so the new constraint is written in the file's existing style rather than the dumper's. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DJ1npaGEHr6t2HW1rYZdt4 * fix(goals): pin the reserve calculation to the family, and get it right on day one Review of the previous commit raised two things, and they are the same thing seen from either end. `IncomeStatement.new(family)` looked family-wide but was only so by accident. Its constructor falls back to `Current.user`, and eligible_accounts narrows to that user's accounts when one is present. The single caller was a background job, where nobody is current — so the figure was correct for the reason that it happened to be computed nowhere else. `target_amount` belongs to the whole family: derived from a viewer's slice of the accounts, it would have started moving with whoever last triggered it. This is the same fallback that made the budget rollover carry depend on its reader. The account scope is now passed explicitly, so the calculation is safe whatever calls it. That mattered immediately, because the second point required a new caller. A reserve created as "6 months of expenses" had no floor computed until the 1st of the following month: the user chose the mode, guessed an amount, and lived with a wrong target for up to a month. The feature's first impression was its least convincing moment. The floor is now computed on creation, and whenever the mode or the number of months changes — but never on an unrelated save, so the monthly job keeps owning the cadence and renaming a goal cannot silently move a financial figure. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DJ1npaGEHr6t2HW1rYZdt4 * fix(goals): keep a months-based floor derived, and in the right currency Review on #3180. The median comes back in FAMILY currency and `target_amount` is stored in the GOAL's, so a EUR reserve in a USD family read a 3,000 dollar floor as 3,000 euros — and rewrote it that way every month, silently. Converted now, and when there is no rate for the day the previous target stands: the same safe failure the method already took for a family with no spending history, because a stale floor beats a wrong one. The callback also skipped a target_amount edit, so the form could persist an arbitrary figure under a "six months of expenses" label until the next monthly refresh. It runs on that edit now and overwrites it — and when there is nothing to derive from, restores what the reserve already had rather than accepting the typed figure. The form marks the field read-only in that mode. The model does not depend on it, but a field that silently discards what you type is worse than one you cannot type into. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
03b783b139 |
feat(budgets): show what is actually free, beside the plan (#3179)
* feat(budgets): show what is actually free, beside the plan The budget has never consulted an account balance. `budgeted_spending` and `expected_income` are numbers the user typed, and every figure on the page derives from them — a forecast, checked against reality after the fact. It answers "what did I plan to spend" and cannot answer "what do I actually have". Three methods answer the second question: `available_cash`, `earmarked_for_goals`, and `free_cash`. They appear in their own panel, below the plan and outside it. That separation is the whole design, not a layout choice. Folding cash into the allocation arithmetic turns the budget into a different product — YNAB's, where you distribute money you hold rather than money you expect — and a page showing "expected income 3,000" beside "really free 1,600" leaves the reader unsure which number drives the split. `allocated_spending` and `available_to_allocate` keep their exact meaning; a test asserts none of them moves. **The subtraction has to be over the same accounts as the sum.** `Goal::FUNDABLE_ACCOUNT_TYPES` includes Investment, so a goal can be backed by a brokerage account that `available_cash` never counted. Subtracting that earmark would show a "really free" figure too low, or negative, with nothing on the page to explain it. `earmarked_for_goals` is therefore restricted to `cash_accounts`, and `Goal#backing_within` exists to ask that question. It reads through the shared pool rather than summing `allocated_amount`, because a whole-account link reserves no fixed slice: summed naively it counts as zero while actually claiming the remainder. Scoped like `#transactions` — a personal budget sees its owner's accounts, the household one what the viewer can see. A figure labelled "available" has to mean available to the person reading it. Behind the preview flag, because goals are: a panel that subtracts what they claim, and links to them, would otherwise point at a page the reader cannot open and explain a subtraction they cannot inspect. bin/rails test: 7083 runs, 28500 assertions, 0 failures. RuboCop, erb_lint and Brakeman clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(budgets): make the cash panel work in more than one currency Review on #3179. Three defects, all of them mine, all in the same seam. `ExchangeRate.find_rate` does not exist. Every multi-currency family opening the budget page hit a NoMethodError before the panel rendered. `find_or_fetch_rate` is the lookup the rest of the app uses. `earmarked_for_goals` summed each goal's backing in the goal's own currency and subtracted it from an `available_cash` that had been converted. A fully earmarked EUR 1,000 account in a USD budget read as 1,200 available, 1,000 earmarked and 200 free — when none of it is free. The French keys landed under `budget_categories` instead of `budgets`, so the partial's `t(".heading")` found nothing and French readers got the English fallback. A missing rate leaves the amount as it stands rather than raising: a panel wrong by the spread beats the whole budget page failing to render. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
f0333c026e |
feat(goals): surface money that left a goal's accounts unexplained (#3177)
* feat(goals): surface money that left a goal's accounts unexplained Goals never read transactions. `current_balance` is a stock summed from account balances, so an outflow reaches a goal only as a smaller number, with nothing saying which goal it belonged to. `consume!` closes that gap, but only for a user who thinks to declare it — and the whole difficulty is that they have no reason to think of it. `Goal::WithdrawalDetector` surfaces the outflows nothing has claimed, and the goal page offers them: *if any of this was spent on Trip, say so*. One click records it with the transaction as evidence. This is the pull half of what `GoalPledge` does for money coming in. A pledge asks first and matches later; here there is nothing to promise, so the outflow is surfaced after the fact and attributed — or not. **Anchored on the transaction, not declared.** `consume!` now takes one and stamps `extra["goal"]["consumed_goal_id"]`, the same namespace the pledges write into. That is what makes attribution idempotent: replaying it cannot credit a goal twice for one spend, and the stamp happens inside the consumption's own transaction so a refusal rolls the whole thing back. **Sign matters more than it reads.** In Sure an inflow carries a NEGATIVE amount, so the detector selects the positive side. Reading it the other way round would have offered to attribute the user's deposits as spending, and the mistake would look right in a diff. A test pins it. **A reserve is excluded.** It is drawn down and refilled, not spent, and asking someone to attribute a withdrawal from one invites them to erase the very shortfall it exists to report. Known limitation, unchanged by this: `GoalPledge::Reconciler` only runs on provider imports, never on a hand-entered transaction. This detector reads entries directly and so has no such gap, but the two halves are not symmetric and that is worth knowing. bin/rails test: 7100 runs, 28540 assertions, 0 failures. RuboCop, erb_lint and Brakeman clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(goals): only offer an outflow the goal could still have spent Review on #3177. The panel offered outflows for completed and archived goals. Those have handed their accounts back, so a later transaction on one is not evidence about this goal — attributing it writes spending into a history that is already closed. The detector now returns nothing for a released goal; `consume!` refuses these too, but the panel should not ask in the first place. Provisional transactions were offered as well. A pending charge can be reversed or replaced by its posted form, leaving the goal consumed for a transaction that no longer exists while the posted twin arrives unstamped and gets offered again. Filtered through the pending-provider SQL the rest of the app already uses. `thaw_completed_amount!` wiped `consumed_amount` unconditionally, so a goal that recorded a spend and was then archived straight from active lost that history on unarchive — and dropped its progress with it. Restarting is what clears the figure, and a direct archive never closed a lifecycle to restart from. Cleared now only when a frozen figure exists. The attribution button was a hand-rolled `button_to` with raw `btn` classes; it is `DS::Button` now, the same primitive the consumption dialog uses, so the two ways of recording a spend do not read as two features. Carried down from #3176 by rebase: the goal-level lock, the `:not_active` guard, and the success notice, which was blank on this path because the form posts only `transaction_id`. The resolved amount is formatted through `Money` and the account behind an attributed outflow now resolves through `accessible_accounts` like the named one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(goals): keep a private backing account out of the outflow panel The same leak #3176 closed on the dialog, through a third door. A goal can be backed by an account private to another family member, and the panel listed its outflows — naming the account, what was spent on it and roughly its size to someone with no access to it. `WithdrawalDetector` takes `accounts:` now, and the controller passes the links narrowed to what the viewer may see. It defaults to every linked account for callers with no viewer to speak for. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(goals): use the shared separator key in the outflow panel DS Drift Patrol on #3177. The `·` between an outflow's date and its account was a bare literal. `shared.dot_separator` already exists and is already used three times in the goals views, so this was drift rather than a missing mechanism. Wrapped in `aria-hidden` like the existing uses: the separator is decorative, and a screen reader was reading it out between the two values. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
b6029c1e28 |
feat(goals): show what each account still has room to earmark (#3166)
* feat(goals): show what each account still has room to earmark `Account#free_to_earmark` has existed, unused, since earmarks shipped — its own comment said the UI was a follow-up. This is that follow-up, and the wording is the substance of it. It does not say "over-allocated". `free_to_earmark` is negative for as long as the saving is unfinished, which is the normal condition of anyone with goals in progress: a 6,000 account backing two goals of 5,000 gives −4,000 and is a perfectly correct setup. A warning phrased as a fault would fire permanently and teach people to ignore it. The message states the consequence instead — the goals come to X for a balance of Y, so they progress pro rata — and is never styled as an error. The trap is the goal being edited. `goal_earmarked_total` counts every goal including that one, so reopening a goal that earmarks 5,000 on a 6,000 account shows 1,000 of headroom, and re-entering the same 5,000 trips a message about a setup the user has not touched. `earmarked_by_other_goals` excludes it, and only when it is persisted — a goal being created has nothing to exclude. The pool is read once per render and passed down, never per account: the form lists every fundable account the user can see. A test counts the query and fails at two. The Stimulus controller is its own, with 3 targets. goal_form_controller is at 10 against the 7 the project guidelines suggest, needs none of this state, and is untouched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DJ1npaGEHr6t2HW1rYZdt4 * fix(goals): read the typed amount strictly, and format it in the app's locale Addresses review feedback on #3166. `Number.parseFloat` accepts prefixes, so "500abc" became 500, and the bare comma-to-dot swap turned a thousands-separated "1,500" into 1.5. Either way the preview described an amount the user had not typed — and the second case is a habit from another locale, not a typo, so it would have gone unnoticed. The value now has to match a complete number before anything is computed. `Intl.NumberFormat(undefined, ...)` let the BROWSER pick the locale, so a French user on an English-locale browser read separators and symbol placement matching nothing else on the page. The amounts cannot be formatted server-side — they change with every keystroke — so the server passes `I18n.locale` and the client applies it. That puts the decision where the rest of the app's formatting already lives. bin/rails test: 6954 runs, 0 failures. RuboCop, erb_lint and biome clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(goals): let the assistant create a second goal on a claimed account Review on #3166. The function always built whole-account links and had no way to express an earmark, so once exclusivity landed, asking for a second goal on an account another goal already claimed came back as a bare `validation_failed` — while the account list still advertised the account as available. A common request became an unexplained refusal. Three changes, and the list is the important one: it now says what is left on each account and which are claimed in full, because the assistant reasons from that list and had no way to know otherwise. `earmarks` is an optional map of account name to amount, so the assistant can reserve a slice rather than the whole balance. Accounts left out keep the previous behaviour and take whatever is spare. The refusal is named before the save — `account_claimed_in_full`, with the account names — so the assistant gets a reason it can act on and ask about, rather than a validation message it can only relay. Checked after the currency check, which is the more fundamental of the two. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * test(goals): move the spend tests back out of the private section The merge of `main` into this branch landed #3176's tests between `count_pool_queries` and the helpers below it, inside the `private` section and at the wrong indentation. `ci / lint` has been failing on `Layout/IndentationConsistency` since. They still ran — `test` is a class method, so `private` does not hide them — which is why the unit job stayed green while lint went red. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye --------- Signed-off-by: Juan José Mata <juanjo.mata@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Juan José Mata <juanjo.mata@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
d7bf401cc7 |
fix(onchain-wallets): call transfers transfers, and drop the address swap (#3153)
* fix(onchain-wallets): call transfers transfers, and drop the address swap Three things reported from real use. **A transfer was announced as a purchase.** A movement was imported with `activity_label: "Buy"/"Sell"` and named "Buy 1.5 FAKE" — but coins arriving at an address were not bought there, and nothing here knows whether they were ever bought at all. The trade shape stays, because it is what carries quantity and cost basis in this ledger, but the label is now "Transfer" and the name is the one the movement already had while it was unpriced. The old wording also made the same event rename itself the day a price turned up for it. Worth pairing with the change to trades/_header.html.erb, which until now read the amount's sign and would still say "Buy" whatever the label. **Changing a tracked address is gone.** It repointed the rows at a new address while keeping their accounts, holdings and history — so trades reconstructed from address A stayed under an account presented as address B. Its own help text said so out loud: "The accounts, holdings and history stay as they are." Removing the address and adding the new one is not just simpler, it is the only one of the two that is honest, because it takes the old history with the old address. **The buttons follow the app's conventions now.** Actions that repeat per row belong in a menu here — accounts/_account.html.erb renders its own that way — not in a row of labelled buttons, which is what a provider panel does when it has a single connection to act on. So the per-address actions are a menu, the per-asset disconnect is icon-only, and the accounts-page card gains the actions menu every other provider card already had. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(onchain-wallets): give a tracked asset its icon on the accounts page Account#logo_url asks its provider adapter for one, and ours answered nothing: there is no institution behind a self-custody wallet, and nothing attaches a file, so every tracked asset showed a blank where every other account shows an icon. Fixing Security#crypto_base_asset covered the holdings list, which reads the security directly — this is the other path, and it went through the adapter. Built from the symbol rather than looked up. The accounts page renders one of these per account, so resolving a Security each would be a query per row, and the symbol is all Brandfetch's crypto endpoint needs. It answers nil without a client id, which is the same nothing the page shows today. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(onchain-wallets): follow the moved banner and the menu in the browser The system suite still expected the settings panel to carry the read-only reassurance, and to find "Review tokens" as a visible button. Both moved in the previous commit: the banner into the linking modal, where the question it answers is actually asked, and the per-address actions into a menu, as repeated row actions are rendered everywhere else in this app. Caught by CI rather than by me — the per-branch checks I ran covered `bin/rails test` and not `test:system`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(onchain-wallets): pin the reassurance to the frame it moved into The assertion proved the banner was somewhere on the page, which is exactly what the change does not claim: the point is where it lives. Now it asserts the text is absent from the settings panel and present inside the modal, so the test fails if the banner drifts back or never arrives. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(onchain-wallets): rename movements imported before transfers had a name Review on #3153. Wallets synced before this change keep their `Buy`/`Sell` labels and their "Buy 1.5 shares of CRYPTO:BTC" wording, and nothing was rewriting them: `perform_sync` returns early when no address changed on chain, and the repair pass only ever looked at display-only `Transaction` rows. A cold address would have shown the old wording indefinitely — which for a wallet nobody touches is most of them. The repair now relabels this processor's own trades too, scoped to its `external_id` prefix and to `source: SOURCE` so a trade the user entered by hand is never renamed. It runs from `perform_post_sync`, which is the pass that already runs for every linked asset rather than only the changed ones. Idempotent, so a nightly sync does not rewrite the same rows forever. Separately: `Security.brandfetch_crypto_url` interpolated the symbol straight into a URL path, and `Onchain::AssetSymbol.canonical` only upcases and trims. An on-chain token can be called whatever its deployer chose, so a slash pointed the path elsewhere on the CDN and a hash pushed the client id into a fragment Brandfetch never sees. Guarded in the helper rather than at the call site — six callers reach it from four providers. Also from review: the icon test saves and restores `Setting.brand_fetch_client_id` instead of hard-coding nil in its `ensure`, which was erasing whatever the suite had configured. The "one query" claim in a repair test's name was never asserted, and this change adds a second query. Renamed to what it actually checks. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * test(onchain): drop the last change_address test with its feature #3182 added a `change_address` test while this branch was removing the feature it exercises. The rebase kept both, leaving a test calling a route this branch deletes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
613964529a |
feat(goals): let a goal be spent without looking like it fell behind (#3176)
* feat(goals): let a goal be spent without looking like it fell behind Coming home from the holiday a goal paid for dropped it from 100% to 20%. The money went where it was meant to go, and the app read that as failure. The only way back was to edit the target — falsifying what the user had actually set out to save. `consumed_amount` records what was spent ON the thing the goal was for, and progress reads `(backing + consumed) / target`. Spending the money is no longer indistinguishable from losing it. **The part that is easy to miss.** `consume!` also shrinks the earmark on the account by the same amount. Without that, money the user has already spent stays reserved and keeps its share away from every sibling goal — the exact double-counting the exclusivity rules exist to prevent, arriving through the back door. A test pins it through the pro-rata haircut, where the effect is visible: a sibling's backing grows as the spent share is released. **Kept separate from `completed_amount`.** That one freezes the BACKING at closure; folding consumption into it would count the same money twice on a goal partly spent and then closed. A test asserts each side is counted once. **A reserve refuses consumption outright.** It is drawn down and refilled, not spent, and recording a withdrawal as consumption would erase the shortfall the reserve exists to report. `account:` may be omitted only when the goal has one link — with several, guessing would silently pick a side. The controller refuses an account id that resolves to nothing rather than falling back to nil, which on a single-link goal would have recorded the spend against an account the user never named. The write is its own action rather than a verb branch inside `consume`: HEAD routes like GET but `request.get?` is false for it, so a branch would send a HEAD request down the write path. Brakeman caught that. bin/rails test: 7088 runs, 28510 assertions, 0 failures. RuboCop, erb_lint and Brakeman clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(goals): make a spend either happen entirely or not at all Review on #3176 found the recorded spend and the released earmark could drift apart, and that nothing stopped the two figures being edited out of agreement afterwards. The lock was on the link, not the goal. `consumed_amount` lives on the goal, so two concurrent requests locking only their own links both read the same old value, both passed the target check, and both added to it. The whole check-and-write now runs under `with_lock` on the goal. Consuming more than the chosen link held was silently clamped: the link released what it had while `consumed_amount` took the full figure, so money counted as spent stayed reserved against every sibling goal. It is refused now — `:exceeds_earmark` — rather than half-applied. A dialog left open in another tab could still post to a goal that had since been completed or archived; `:not_active` closes that. Two validations stop the pair being separated after the fact: a goal that has recorded a spend cannot become a reserve (reserves refuse consumption, so the figure would count toward progress on an object whose model treats spending as a shortfall), and the target cannot be lowered below what was already spent. Consuming cleared the columns and left the memos standing, so an instance that had already read its backing kept reporting the pre-spend figure. Progress holding steady is the feature — the earmark shrinks by what consumption grows by — which is exactly what hid the stale backing. Also from review: `accessible_accounts` rather than the whole family for the account picker, `DS::Select` rather than a bare `select_tag`, the flash amount through `Money#format`, and the French label for the menu entry, which I had left untranslated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * refactor(goals): reuse the cache reset the class already owns Review pointed out `reset_state_dependent_caches!` exists for exactly this, and that hand-rolling a second ivar list was the wrong shape. It was also wrong in substance: mine omitted `@pooled_allocations`, and consuming shrinks a link's allocation, which is precisely what the pool is computed from. One list, kept in one place, stays right when a memo is added. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * docs(goals): put four comments back on the methods they describe Rebases had stranded them: a paragraph about clearing memos on an AASM transition, two about what reopening does to a frozen figure, and one about `reload` leaving memos standing had all piled up in front of `consumption_link_for`, which does none of those things. The last is dropped rather than moved — its explanation now sits at the call site in `consume!`, where the reset actually happens. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(goals): keep a private backing account out of the consume dialog A goal can be backed by an account the viewer is not allowed to see, and the first pass only guarded the named-account path. Two ways round it remained. The dialog listed every link, so it named private accounts outright. And with `account_id` left blank the model picked the sole link on its own, without anyone having checked the viewer could reach it — so a direct POST reduced a private account's earmark, the figures moving afterwards saying roughly how much was in it. The controller now derives the eligible links from `Current.user.accessible_accounts`, the dialog renders those, and a blank id resolves only to a sole *eligible* account. With none the request is refused; with several it stays nil and the model asks, as before. Naming the account explicitly matters even when the goal has several links: the one the viewer can reach is not necessarily the one the model would have picked. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
ec75b054e4 |
Bump version to next iteration after v0.7.4-alpha.10 release (#3185)
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
90203139bf |
feat(goals): tell the user when a reserve has dropped below its level (#3175)
* feat(goals): reserves you maintain, not goals you finish An emergency fund is not a goal you reach and close — it is a level you hold, and every withdrawal is a shortfall to make good. Sure treated it like anything else: at 100% it offered to close it, which would release the very money being set aside; a withdrawal dropped the bar with no sign that anything was owed. `kind` (added by the lifecycle lot without behavior) now means something. A maintained goal is `funded` or `depleted`, never `reached` — sitting at its floor is a steady state, not an achievement to file away. `complete` is refused by an AASM guard rather than merely hidden, so no path can release a reserve's earmark. Two ordering traps, both of which would have made a drained reserve invisible: `ACTIVE_DISPLAY_STATUS_RANK` falls back to 4 for any status it does not know, so an unranked `:depleted` would sort a drained emergency fund below everything else — the exact opposite of what it means. It ranks alongside `:behind` now, and `:funded` sorts near the end with the goals that need nothing. `behind_pace?` excludes reserves. `monthly_target_amount` and `pace` both derive from `target_date`, which a reserve does not have, so "save X/month to catch up" would be advice about a deadline that does not exist. The form leads with the choice, since it changes what the rest of it means, and hides the target date for a reserve rather than disabling it — a hidden field cannot submit a stale value that would then drive a pace. The card states the shortfall, which is exactly `remaining_amount`. The panel that offers a one-off its closing action tells a reserve it is intact and offers nothing, because there is nothing to do. Scope: fixed targets only. Targets expressed in months of expenses, the monthly refresh job, and the depletion insight are the next two PRs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DJ1npaGEHr6t2HW1rYZdt4 * fix(goals): let a reserve behave like one everywhere it is shown Addresses review feedback on #3167. The kind selector never hid the target date. `data-controller="goal-kind"` sat on the selector div while its `dateField` target is a sibling, so `dateFieldTargets` came back empty and picking "Reserve to maintain" left the deadline on screen and submittable. The controller moves to the form wrapper, which encloses both. Hiding a field is not enforcement, so the model now clears `target_date` for a maintained goal. Normalising rather than rejecting: the field is hidden, and an error about something the user cannot see is not actionable. A date could only arrive through a conversion or a crafted request, and either way a stored deadline would drive a pace the reserve does not have. A completed goal could be switched to `maintained` from the edit form. It then sat in a released state — one that has handed its earmark back — while the show page promised its money stays reserved, and `complete` for reserves is refused precisely to prevent that state. `kind` is now locked while released: reopen first. Reserves counted against the "goals on track" tile. Their statuses are `funded`/`depleted`, which match none of the exclusions in `tracked_total`, so they could never reach the numerator and a family with one reserve read "0 of 1 on track" for a goal working exactly as intended. Two more places still spoke of pace to something that has none. `pace_line` is suppressed for reserves on the card, and a depleted reserve gets its own panel before the projection card — the projection's summary, catch-up line and colour are all built from a deadline. What a drained reserve needs is the number the projection cannot show: how much is missing from the floor. The French celebration copy read "Votre réserve est à son niveau", which never says which level. Each guard was confirmed load-bearing by removing it and watching its test fail. bin/rails test: 6962 runs, 28003 assertions, 0 failures. RuboCop, erb_lint and Brakeman clean. Left open deliberately: extracting the show page's lifecycle panel into a ViewComponent. The guideline behind it is right, but the refactor is wider than this round of fixes and belongs on its own. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(goals): finish teaching the status consumers about reserves Second round of review feedback on #3167: two consumers still had no branch for the reserve statuses. `ProgressRingComponent#percent_text_class` styled only `:reached` as success, so a funded reserve — a floor the user is holding exactly as intended — fell back to the neutral colour and read as unfinished. `status_callout_context` had no `:depleted` branch, so a drained reserve showed no callout at all: the one status that most deserves a line of explanation was the only one saying nothing. It now names the shortfall. `:funded` deliberately keeps no callout — a reserve at its level has nothing to report, and the celebration panel already says so. A test pins that, so the silence reads as a decision rather than another missing branch. bin/rails test: 6964 runs, 28008 assertions, 0 failures. RuboCop and Brakeman clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(goals): lock the kind on the state the goal is actually in Addresses review feedback on #3167, on the guard that landed in c1c7f4f7. `kind_locked_while_released` read the in-memory `state`, so a single write setting `state: "active"` alongside the new kind saw the goal as already reopened and waved it through. The end state looks legitimate — active and maintained — which is why the hole is easy to miss. It is not: the direct write skipped the `reopen` transition, and with it `thaw_completed_amount!`. `completed_amount` survived, so `current_balance` returned that frozen snapshot forever on a live reserve. Reopening has to be its own gesture, because it is the gesture that thaws. Now reads `state_in_database`, with a regression test on the combined write asserting both that it is refused and that the frozen amount is untouched. Confirmed load-bearing by reading the attribute again and watching it fail. bin/rails test: 6969 runs, 28019 assertions, 0 failures. RuboCop and Brakeman clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(goals): send an empty reserve to the shortfall panel, not the empty state Addresses the last review thread on #3167. The `maintained?` branch sat after the zero-balance/zero-pace one, so a brand-new reserve matched the generic "make your first transfer" card. I had put it there on purpose, thinking a reserve with nothing in it wanted the first-transfer nudge. The review is right that it does not: it is still a reserve short of its floor, and the shortfall panel says so with the saved, target and missing amounts, where the generic card says none of them. Ordering it after also meant evaluating `pace` on a goal that has no pace to evaluate. bin/rails test: 6965 runs, 0 failures. RuboCop and erb_lint clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(goals): stop a paused goal outranking a reserve that is whole Review on #3175. `:funded` and paused both ranked 3 in `active_display_sort`, so the tie broke on name and a paused goal called "Alpha" sat above a reserve called "Zeta" that was fully funded — the list saying the paused one wanted attention more. Paused now ranks behind every status, which is what the comment above the table already claimed. The seven panels on the goal page were hand-rolled repetitions of `DS::Card`'s exact shell, two of them adjacent and identical. They render through the primitive now, so their surface styling cannot drift apart. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * refactor(goals): move the lifecycle panel decision out of the template Review on #3167 and #3180. Which panel a goal gets is a lifecycle question with five answers, and the template worked it out inline from `completed?`, `maintained?`, `one_off?`, `status` and `may_complete?` — five predicates deep in ERB where the ordering between them was load-bearing and nothing said so. `Goals::LifecyclePanelComponent` answers it in Ruby and the template renders the answer. The markup moves across unchanged, keys made absolute because a relative `t(".x")` in a component resolves against the component's own path rather than the page these strings belong to. The order is now stated once, where it can be read and tested: `:reserve_shortfall` before `:empty`, because a brand-new reserve sits at zero balance and zero pace and the generic "make your first transfer" card would otherwise swallow it. Closing from the panel now confirms, as the header menu already did. Completing releases the goal's earmarked money, and the panel offered that in one click. Both go through `goal_complete_confirm` rather than building the wording twice — two copies drifting apart is how one ends up describing the wrong consequence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(goals): refresh the pace suggestion when the deadline is cleared Assigning `input.value = ""` fires no event, so `goal-form#suggestedChanged` never ran: selecting "Reserve to maintain" cleared the date but left the monthly pace suggestion on screen, derived from a deadline the goal no longer has. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(goals): let a depleted reserve look as urgent as it is Review on #3179 and #3180. `Goal#needs_attention?` names the pair of statuses that mean "this one wants looking at" — a goal off its pace and a reserve below its floor. Three places were spelling that out and the Plan hub's progress bar had fallen behind, so a depleted reserve got a neutral bar an inch from its own amber status pill: the same goal reported as needing attention and not. `projection_summary` told a funded reserve it had "hit the target, no projection needed". A reserve holds a level; there is no finish line to project toward and no target to have hit. It does not reach that panel today — the shortfall and celebration panels catch it first — but the method reads as the single source of truth for that subtitle and should not hand a caller a one-off's wording. The legend swatches are bordered spans now rather than inline SVG, and the label takes `text-xs` instead of an arbitrary 11px. The projection swatch keeps the chart's own colour variables in an inline style rather than `border-success` / `border-warning`: the chart hard-codes green-600 and yellow-600, and a legend whose colour does not match the line it describes is worse than the markup it would save. The Plan-card test counts warning bars rather than matching one. A fixture goal is already off its pace, so the markup is on the page either way and a presence check passed without the fix. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * feat(goals): tell the user when a reserve has dropped below its level A maintained reserve exists to hold a floor. Nothing said when it stopped holding it: the goal page shows the shortfall, but only to someone who thought to look, and a reserve is precisely the thing you stop looking at once it is full. That silence is the gap this closes. High priority, unlike most of this feed. `IdleCashGenerator` is a nudge about money doing nothing; this is the opposite — a floor the user deliberately set is no longer there. It is also the one signal a reserve can produce that a one-off goal cannot, which is what makes it worth a generator of its own. Three deliberate limits: - **Active reserves only.** A paused one is shelved on purpose, and `behind_pace?` already excludes paused goals for the same reason. Nagging about a goal someone put down is noise. - **The dedup key rotates monthly.** A reserve can sit short for weeks while it is rebuilt, and re-raising the same shortfall every night trains people to dismiss the feed. - **Two at a time, worst shortfall first.** A family running four drained reserves has one problem, not four. Loaded through `Goal.prepared_for` so the family-wide pooled allocations are read once: asking each reserve for its status reaches `current_balance`, and without that injection every one of them would re-read the whole pool. bin/rails test: 7079 runs, 28491 assertions, 0 failures. RuboCop and Brakeman clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(insights): stop an insight naming something that has been renamed Review on #3175: renaming a depleted reserve leaves the stored title naming the old one for the rest of the month, because the name is not part of the metadata that drives a refresh. Rather than making the name material, the same-signal branch now refreshes the title alongside the facts. The title is built from I18n and the generator's own data — the model writes the body, not this — so keeping it current costs nothing, and a rename is not a reason to resurface an insight the user has already read. The body still says the old name until the numbers move. Forcing an LLM rewrite on every rename is the wrong trade, and making the name material would do that *and* re-nag the user. This is generic to every generator whose title embeds a name, not only the reserve one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(insights): refresh the title on reactivation too A gap in the previous commit: the expired-and-returned branch resurfaces an insight without touching its title, so a subject renamed while the insight was expired came back naming the old one. Same reasoning as the same-signal branch — the title is I18n plus the generator's own data, not the model's prose, so keeping it current costs nothing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
2c0d262cf6 |
fix(onchain): a deleted account leaves no wallet row behind (#3182)
* fix(onchain): a deleted account leaves no wallet row behind Deleting a Sure account left its on-chain tracking row in place. The row had a callback to follow its account link into the grave, but the guard that stopped it destroying itself could not tell apart the two ways that link dies — by the row, or by the account — and so caught both. What survived was worse than untidy. The row synced nothing and showed nowhere, yet it still answered "yes" to "is this address already tracked?" and still held the asset's slot in the partial unique index. The address became unusable: adding it again was refused as a duplicate of something the user could not see, and moving another address onto it raised a database error. So three places learn the difference between a row that tracks an account and one that merely exists: the guard now skips only its own row's destruction, the family's linked check asks for a live link, and the linker and address change let a dead row make way instead of colliding with it. No migration: a row already orphaned on a running instance is absorbed the next time that address is tracked. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013nN1GZi7Dv3d7yZUozw3Yo * fix(onchain): stop an orphan row passing itself off as a tracked asset Review on #3182. Both findings are the same root: a row left behind by a deleted account has no Account and no AccountProvider, but nothing downstream was asking. `revise` counted any matching row as tracked, orphans included, so ticking an asset whose account had been deleted did nothing at all — no Account created, the row still orphaned, and the screen still reporting the asset as tracked. It now looks only at rows that are actually linked, and at the ones that survived the removal pass. `link` cleared only the rows matching the assets picked in that submit, so relinking a subset left the rest as orphans. They still show up in `grouped_accounts` and token review as tracked, and — before the fix above — they also stopped `revise` from ever rebuilding them. Reclaiming an address now clears every row it left behind. A live row is untouched, with a test that fails if the sweep widens. One existing test had to change its premise rather than its assertion. It built two unlinked rows and asserted the surviving row object was the same one; unlinked rows are orphans, so revising now rebuilds them and the survivor is a new row. Linking them first is what a tracked asset actually is, and the assertion then measures the removal it was written for. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
6d7ca3584c |
feat(goals): reserves you maintain, not goals you finish (#3167)
* feat(goals): reserves you maintain, not goals you finish An emergency fund is not a goal you reach and close — it is a level you hold, and every withdrawal is a shortfall to make good. Sure treated it like anything else: at 100% it offered to close it, which would release the very money being set aside; a withdrawal dropped the bar with no sign that anything was owed. `kind` (added by the lifecycle lot without behavior) now means something. A maintained goal is `funded` or `depleted`, never `reached` — sitting at its floor is a steady state, not an achievement to file away. `complete` is refused by an AASM guard rather than merely hidden, so no path can release a reserve's earmark. Two ordering traps, both of which would have made a drained reserve invisible: `ACTIVE_DISPLAY_STATUS_RANK` falls back to 4 for any status it does not know, so an unranked `:depleted` would sort a drained emergency fund below everything else — the exact opposite of what it means. It ranks alongside `:behind` now, and `:funded` sorts near the end with the goals that need nothing. `behind_pace?` excludes reserves. `monthly_target_amount` and `pace` both derive from `target_date`, which a reserve does not have, so "save X/month to catch up" would be advice about a deadline that does not exist. The form leads with the choice, since it changes what the rest of it means, and hides the target date for a reserve rather than disabling it — a hidden field cannot submit a stale value that would then drive a pace. The card states the shortfall, which is exactly `remaining_amount`. The panel that offers a one-off its closing action tells a reserve it is intact and offers nothing, because there is nothing to do. Scope: fixed targets only. Targets expressed in months of expenses, the monthly refresh job, and the depletion insight are the next two PRs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DJ1npaGEHr6t2HW1rYZdt4 * fix(goals): let a reserve behave like one everywhere it is shown Addresses review feedback on #3167. The kind selector never hid the target date. `data-controller="goal-kind"` sat on the selector div while its `dateField` target is a sibling, so `dateFieldTargets` came back empty and picking "Reserve to maintain" left the deadline on screen and submittable. The controller moves to the form wrapper, which encloses both. Hiding a field is not enforcement, so the model now clears `target_date` for a maintained goal. Normalising rather than rejecting: the field is hidden, and an error about something the user cannot see is not actionable. A date could only arrive through a conversion or a crafted request, and either way a stored deadline would drive a pace the reserve does not have. A completed goal could be switched to `maintained` from the edit form. It then sat in a released state — one that has handed its earmark back — while the show page promised its money stays reserved, and `complete` for reserves is refused precisely to prevent that state. `kind` is now locked while released: reopen first. Reserves counted against the "goals on track" tile. Their statuses are `funded`/`depleted`, which match none of the exclusions in `tracked_total`, so they could never reach the numerator and a family with one reserve read "0 of 1 on track" for a goal working exactly as intended. Two more places still spoke of pace to something that has none. `pace_line` is suppressed for reserves on the card, and a depleted reserve gets its own panel before the projection card — the projection's summary, catch-up line and colour are all built from a deadline. What a drained reserve needs is the number the projection cannot show: how much is missing from the floor. The French celebration copy read "Votre réserve est à son niveau", which never says which level. Each guard was confirmed load-bearing by removing it and watching its test fail. bin/rails test: 6962 runs, 28003 assertions, 0 failures. RuboCop, erb_lint and Brakeman clean. Left open deliberately: extracting the show page's lifecycle panel into a ViewComponent. The guideline behind it is right, but the refactor is wider than this round of fixes and belongs on its own. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(goals): finish teaching the status consumers about reserves Second round of review feedback on #3167: two consumers still had no branch for the reserve statuses. `ProgressRingComponent#percent_text_class` styled only `:reached` as success, so a funded reserve — a floor the user is holding exactly as intended — fell back to the neutral colour and read as unfinished. `status_callout_context` had no `:depleted` branch, so a drained reserve showed no callout at all: the one status that most deserves a line of explanation was the only one saying nothing. It now names the shortfall. `:funded` deliberately keeps no callout — a reserve at its level has nothing to report, and the celebration panel already says so. A test pins that, so the silence reads as a decision rather than another missing branch. bin/rails test: 6964 runs, 28008 assertions, 0 failures. RuboCop and Brakeman clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(goals): lock the kind on the state the goal is actually in Addresses review feedback on #3167, on the guard that landed in c1c7f4f7. `kind_locked_while_released` read the in-memory `state`, so a single write setting `state: "active"` alongside the new kind saw the goal as already reopened and waved it through. The end state looks legitimate — active and maintained — which is why the hole is easy to miss. It is not: the direct write skipped the `reopen` transition, and with it `thaw_completed_amount!`. `completed_amount` survived, so `current_balance` returned that frozen snapshot forever on a live reserve. Reopening has to be its own gesture, because it is the gesture that thaws. Now reads `state_in_database`, with a regression test on the combined write asserting both that it is refused and that the frozen amount is untouched. Confirmed load-bearing by reading the attribute again and watching it fail. bin/rails test: 6969 runs, 28019 assertions, 0 failures. RuboCop and Brakeman clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(goals): send an empty reserve to the shortfall panel, not the empty state Addresses the last review thread on #3167. The `maintained?` branch sat after the zero-balance/zero-pace one, so a brand-new reserve matched the generic "make your first transfer" card. I had put it there on purpose, thinking a reserve with nothing in it wanted the first-transfer nudge. The review is right that it does not: it is still a reserve short of its floor, and the shortfall panel says so with the saved, target and missing amounts, where the generic card says none of them. Ordering it after also meant evaluating `pace` on a goal that has no pace to evaluate. bin/rails test: 6965 runs, 0 failures. RuboCop and erb_lint clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(goals): stop a paused goal outranking a reserve that is whole Review on #3175. `:funded` and paused both ranked 3 in `active_display_sort`, so the tie broke on name and a paused goal called "Alpha" sat above a reserve called "Zeta" that was fully funded — the list saying the paused one wanted attention more. Paused now ranks behind every status, which is what the comment above the table already claimed. The seven panels on the goal page were hand-rolled repetitions of `DS::Card`'s exact shell, two of them adjacent and identical. They render through the primitive now, so their surface styling cannot drift apart. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * refactor(goals): move the lifecycle panel decision out of the template Review on #3167 and #3180. Which panel a goal gets is a lifecycle question with five answers, and the template worked it out inline from `completed?`, `maintained?`, `one_off?`, `status` and `may_complete?` — five predicates deep in ERB where the ordering between them was load-bearing and nothing said so. `Goals::LifecyclePanelComponent` answers it in Ruby and the template renders the answer. The markup moves across unchanged, keys made absolute because a relative `t(".x")` in a component resolves against the component's own path rather than the page these strings belong to. The order is now stated once, where it can be read and tested: `:reserve_shortfall` before `:empty`, because a brand-new reserve sits at zero balance and zero pace and the generic "make your first transfer" card would otherwise swallow it. Closing from the panel now confirms, as the header menu already did. Completing releases the goal's earmarked money, and the panel offered that in one click. Both go through `goal_complete_confirm` rather than building the wording twice — two copies drifting apart is how one ends up describing the wrong consequence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(goals): refresh the pace suggestion when the deadline is cleared Assigning `input.value = ""` fires no event, so `goal-form#suggestedChanged` never ran: selecting "Reserve to maintain" cleared the date but left the monthly pace suggestion on screen, derived from a deadline the goal no longer has. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye * fix(goals): let a depleted reserve look as urgent as it is Review on #3179 and #3180. `Goal#needs_attention?` names the pair of statuses that mean "this one wants looking at" — a goal off its pace and a reserve below its floor. Three places were spelling that out and the Plan hub's progress bar had fallen behind, so a depleted reserve got a neutral bar an inch from its own amber status pill: the same goal reported as needing attention and not. `projection_summary` told a funded reserve it had "hit the target, no projection needed". A reserve holds a level; there is no finish line to project toward and no target to have hit. It does not reach that panel today — the shortfall and celebration panels catch it first — but the method reads as the single source of truth for that subtitle and should not hand a caller a one-off's wording. The legend swatches are bordered spans now rather than inline SVG, and the label takes `text-xs` instead of an arbitrary 11px. The projection swatch keeps the chart's own colour variables in an inline style rather than `border-success` / `border-warning`: the chart hard-codes green-600 and yellow-600, and a legend whose colour does not match the line it describes is worse than the markup it would save. The Plan-card test counts warning bars rather than matching one. A fixture goal is already off its pace, so the markup is on the page either way and a presence check passed without the fix. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
77a55fff5b |
fix(desktop): support a server hosted under a sub-path (#3127)
* fix(desktop): support a server hosted under a sub-path `normalize_server_url` rebuilt whatever you typed as `scheme://host[:port]` and dropped the path, so a self-hosted Sure behind a reverse proxy that mounts it under a prefix — `https://home.example.com/sure` — could never be added: the health check hit `{origin}/up`, where something else (or nothing) answers, and the app reported "Couldn't reach a Sure server at that address." The same bare origin was then used for the navigation, the SSO hand-off and the IPC capability grant, so even a passing check would have loaded the wrong site. The path was being dropped for a reason — people paste the URL they have in the clipboard, which is usually a deep link like `/sessions/new`. So rather than guess, let the server say where it is: keep the path in the canonical form, and have `check_server` probe `/up` from the address as typed back up to the origin, returning the first base that answers 200. A root-hosted server still resolves to its origin (one extra candidate, tried only after the specific one 404s), and a transport-level failure returns immediately instead of retrying a host that is not there. `check_server` now answers with that resolved base instead of a bool, and both callers save it rather than the raw input. Tests: the sub-path base, trailing slash / query / fragment trimming, the walk-up candidate list, ports preserved on every candidate, and the cap that still keeps the origin. * fix(desktop): carry the mounted base through SSO and deep links Follow-up to the sub-path support in the previous commit: saving a base with a path fixed adding and loading such a server, but left two flows resolving against the bare origin. The injected bridge only intercepted a form action shaped exactly `/auth/{provider}`, so a mounted server's `/sure/auth/{provider}` was never intercepted, and it emitted `location.origin`, which `begin_sso` would then reject as an unknown server. Match the prefix that precedes `/auth/` and emit the base it implies — empty at a domain root, so root-hosted deployments are unaffected. Deep links were gated on `target.server`, which `deep_link::parse` builds from host and port alone. Gate on the destination instead, and let `is_known_server` accept a URL that a saved base covers. `base_covers` matches only at a path boundary, so a saved `https://sure.example.com` does not cover `https://sure.example.com.evil.test`. Reported by automated review on the PR. * fix(desktop): cap candidates from the deep middle, not the shallow end The cap kept the deepest MAX_BASE_CANDIDATES - 1 candidates plus the origin, which discards the shallow ones in between — and a mount point is shallow. A server mounted at /sure, reached by a link pasted three segments into the app (`/sure/transactions/123/edit`), produced `.../edit`, `.../123`, `/sure/transactions`, origin: `/sure`, the only base that answers, was never probed, so the connection failed with "Couldn't reach a Sure server at that address" against a live server. Keep the address as typed plus the shallowest bases instead. Both readings survive the cap: the base typed exactly, and the mount a deep link sits under. Reported by @jjmata in review. * fix(desktop): bound discovery by mount depth, not candidate count Capping the candidate list drops whole mount depths silently: with a budget of four, `https://host/a/b/c/d/e` never probed `https://host/a/b/c`, so a server mounted there was undiscoverable. Bound the supported mount depth instead. The address as typed is always probed first, so a base entered exactly still works at any depth; the rest are every depth up to MAX_MOUNT_DEPTH, which keeps a pasted deep link finite (typed + 4 probes) without skipping a depth in between. Reported by coderabbitai in review. |
||
|
|
eb498cfa0c |
Feature/category hierarchy and account search (#2845)
* Add parent/child category hierarchy to all category selects; add search to account select
Category selection consistency:
- DS::Select (shared component powering the main transaction form,
transaction edit, bulk-update, and transfer category pickers) now
indents subcategories with a corner-down-right icon, matching the
existing transaction-row category dropdown.
- Feed DS::Select-based category pickers with Category.alphabetically_by_hierarchy
(parent name, then parent-before-children, then own name) so children
render directly under their parent.
- Added Category::Group.select_options, a shared helper producing
parent-then-child ordered options (with an indent marker) for plain
HTML <select> elements. Used by:
- Rule builder category condition/action selects
- Bulk 'categorize transactions' select
- CSV/QIF import category mapping select
- Grouped the splits category combobox and the transaction search
category filter checklist the same way, both with the
corner-down-right indent icon used elsewhere.
Account selection:
- Added searchable: true to the account select in the new/edit
transaction form, matching the category and merchant selects next
to it.
* Fix SyntaxError: 'for' is a Ruby reserved keyword
Category::Group.select_options called for(categories) as a bare method
call, but Ruby parses a bare 'for' as the start of a for..in loop
statement, not a method invocation. Qualify it as self.for(categories)
to call the class method explicitly.
Verified with 'ruby -c' on all touched .rb files and ERB.new(...).src
on all touched .erb files.
* Add test coverage for category hierarchy and account search
Model-level:
- Category::GroupTest (new): for() grouping and the new select_options
helper (order + indent labels).
- CategoryTest: alphabetically_by_hierarchy scope ordering.
- Rule::ConditionFilter::TransactionCategoryTest (new)
- Rule::ActionExecutor::SetTransactionCategoryTest (new)
- Import::CategoryMappingTest (new): grouping + 'Add as new category'
still prepends correctly.
Controller/integration-level (asserting actual rendered HTML order):
- SplitsControllerTest: category combobox data-value ordering.
- Transactions::CategorizesControllerTest: bulk-categorize <select>
option ordering.
- TransactionsControllerTest:
- search filter checkbox ordering (q[categories][])
- new-transaction DS::Select category ordering (via trigger id +
ancestor traversal)
- new-transaction account select renders a search box
All new/modified test files verified with 'ruby -c' (syntax) and
cross-checked fixture names, family scoping, route helpers, and field
names against the actual fixtures/routes/views. Ruby/Bundler network
access to rubygems.org is unavailable in this sandbox, so the suite
itself has not been executed — run 'bin/rails test' before merging.
* Align with design-sure conventions: keep domain logic in component, not template
Per .cursor/rules/view_conventions.mdc ('keep domain logic out of the
views'), the parent/child hierarchy check for DS::Select items belongs
in the component class, not inline in the ERB template. DS::Select
already has this exact pattern for other per-item derived properties
(color_for, icon_for, logo_for) — added child? alongside them and
updated the template to call it instead of computing it inline.
Added test/components/DS/select_test.rb (ViewComponent::TestCase,
no rendering needed) covering child? directly: subcategory objects,
root-category objects, non-hierarchical objects (merchants), and the
include_blank placeholder item.
Also did a broader pass against the design-sure .cursor/rules to confirm
the rest of this branch's changes already comply:
- Uses Current.family (never current_family) throughout
- Uses the icon() helper exclusively, never lucide_icon directly
- No new/hardcoded colors; only existing semantic Tailwind tokens
already used elsewhere in these same files
- No changes to sure-design-system.css / application.css
- Extended existing components/partials rather than creating new ones
where one already existed (view_conventions.mdc component-vs-partial
guidance)
- Test additions stay in Minitest + fixtures, avoid system tests,
and test query-method output directly (testing.mdc)
* Address CodeRabbit review: sort category groups, tighten test assertion, move grouping out of view
* Address review: fix arrow leak in rule summaries, filter panel alignment, simplify splits ordering
* fix(pages): set breadcrumbs for changelog and feedback pages (#2889)
* fix(app): set breadcrumbs for changelog and feedback pages
* feat(test): add test to assert breadcrumbs
* fix(test): remove changes
* feat(app): update breadcrumbs to use semantic nav element
* feat(test): add breadcrumb assertions to changelog and feedback pages
* fix(app): replace breadcrumb nav element with div containing data-breadcrumbs attribute
* fix ci failures
* resolved failures
* Regenerate schema.rb from migrations
* Fix test
* Remove schema dump noise
---------
Signed-off-by: Shibu M <23173570+DataEnginr@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan José Mata <juanjo.mata@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude <claude@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Kenrick Tandrian <60643640+KenTandrian@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Juan José Mata <juanjo.mata@gmail.com>
|
||
|
|
3a9c8baf81 |
Warn before provider setup without encryption keys (#3007)
* Warn before provider setup without encryption keys * Cover provider encryption warning states * Warn on inline provider credential forms * Avoid duplicate provider encryption warnings * Add German passkey translations * Standardize provider encryption warnings |
||
|
|
d18d853c8e | fix(lunchflow): keep balances current during rate limits (#3129) | ||
|
|
8f9529fbe9 |
feat(goals): a reached goal lets go of the money it was holding (#3165)
* fix(goals): stop two goals from each claiming the same account in full
A GoalAccount with a NULL `allocated_amount` means "dedicate the whole
balance". Two of them on one account each claimed all of it, so the money
was counted twice:
Livret A, 6,000 precaution 6,000 vacances 6,000
progress: 100% progress: 100%
`Goal#backing_share_for` cannot catch this. Its pro-rata haircut only
scales FIXED earmarks, and an unallocated link contributes `nil.to_d` —
zero — to `others_fixed`, so the two links never see each other. The
invariant "shares never sum past the balance" held for every earmark
except the one that claims everything.
Enforce it at the door: GoalAccount now refuses a second whole-balance
link on an account another non-archived goal already claims in full, and
asks for an amount instead. The scope matches
`Goal.pooled_allocations_for` — archived goals are excluded from the
backing math, so they do not block; completed goals still hold their
money, so they do.
Rows written before this guard stay readable and editable. Autosave
revalidates every loaded goal_account on `goal.save`, so validating
untouched links would make a goal that merely holds a legacy overlap
impossible to rename. Only a new link, or one whose amount is being
cleared onto a contested account, is checked.
The goal fixtures encoded exactly the forbidden state — three goals
claiming `depository` in full — so tests that built a fourth whole
claim now use accounts of their own. `build_goal` mirrors the old
balance, leaving every KPI figure unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DJ1npaGEHr6t2HW1rYZdt4
* fix(goals): keep a restored goal from re-claiming an account in full
Addresses review feedback on #3160, raised independently on #3165, #3166 and
#3167 — one bug seen four times, because those branches stack.
Archiving a goal releases the accounts it claimed in full, so another goal can
legitimately claim one while it is away. Restoring it then put two
whole-account links back on the same account and reopened the double-counting
`whole_account_link_must_be_exclusive` closes: that check only fires when a
link is written, and a state change writes none.
A validation rather than an AASM guard. `may_fire_event?` stays true, the save
fails, and GoalsController#perform_transition! already surfaces
`errors.full_messages` — the user reads which goal holds the account instead of
a generic "can't do that in this state".
The conflict lookup now lives in one place, `Goal#whole_account_conflicts_on`,
read both by the door (writing a link) and by the restore, so the two cannot
drift into disagreeing about which goals still hold their money. The
`new_record? || will_save_change_to_allocated_amount?` bound stays on the
validation rather than moving into the shared lookup: it exists so a goal
merely holding a legacy overlap can still be renamed.
`Goal::RELEASED_STATES` replaces the repeated "archived" literal. The old
comment already said this scope had to move with the pool's; the constant makes
that true rather than hoped for, and the restore guard will follow the day the
set grows.
Restores from a released state are guarded; `resume` from `paused` is not. A
paused goal never let go of its accounts, so nothing can legitimately have
claimed one meanwhile, and blocking it would strand a user on a goal they
merely shelved.
Two things this surfaced in the test data:
- The fixtures had three goals each claiming `depository` in full — the exact
state the rule forbids. `test "AASM transitions"` failed on it, a true
positive. Two of them now take a fixed 1,000 slice.
- `current_balance sums linked account balances` asserted the gross balance,
which only held because of that overlap. A whole-account link takes what is
left after other goals' fixed earmarks; the test now says so, and computes it
from the data rather than a constant.
Each guard was confirmed load-bearing by removing it and watching its test
fail. bin/rails test: 6936 runs, 27911 assertions, 0 failures. RuboCop,
erb_lint and Brakeman clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye
* fix(goals): treat moving a whole-account link as the fresh claim it is
Addresses review feedback on #3160.
The exclusivity check was bounded to `new_record? ||
will_save_change_to_allocated_amount?`. A persisted whole-account row whose
`account_id` or `goal_id` changes is neither, so moving one landed it on an
account nobody had checked — the same double-counting hole a restore opened,
through a different door.
The bound is widened rather than dropped. It exists because `Goal has_many
:goal_accounts, autosave: true` revalidates every loaded child on `goal.save`,
so an unguarded check makes a goal that merely holds a legacy overlap
impossible to rename. That reason still holds for every row along for the ride;
it does not hold for a row being moved. A test pins both faces.
bin/rails test: 6939 runs, 27916 assertions, 0 failures. RuboCop and Brakeman
clean. Confirmed load-bearing by narrowing the bound back and watching the move
test fail.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye
* fix(goals): stop a link that is changing goals from conflicting with itself
Addresses review feedback on #3160, on the widening that landed in
|
||
|
|
c3cfdf03b2 |
fix(rules): validate Rule::Condition type registry + normalize legacy values (#1908)
* fix(rules): validate Rule::Condition type registry + normalize legacy 'name' values Closes #1229. /rules crashes with `ActionView::Template::Error (Unsupported condition type: name)` when a Rule::Condition row has a condition_type the registry doesn't know about. Reporter found two cases in the wild: - "name" — invalid, crashes the rules index because the view path (`_rule.html.erb` → `displayed_condition.filter.label`) ends up in `Rule::Registry#get_filter!` which raises. - "transaction_details" — actually a valid filter that searches the `transactions.extra` JSONB metadata field (see existing tests in test/models/rule/condition_test.rb). Reporter assumed it was a transaction-name synonym; it isn't. This PR leaves it alone. Changes: - Rule::Condition gains a SUPPORTED_CONDITION_TYPES registry constant matching Rule::Registry::TransactionResource#condition_filters plus "compound", an inclusion validation against it, and a before_validation callback that maps the one known legacy alias ("name" -> "transaction_name") so saving an existing rule fixes itself. - Rule::Condition#filter now rescues UnsupportedConditionError and returns a Rule::ConditionFilter::Unsupported placeholder. The placeholder labels itself "Unsupported (<key>)" (i18n) and its #apply returns `scope.none`, so any stale row that survives the migration stops matching rather than silently matching everything. - A one-shot migration normalizes existing "name" rows. Single UPDATE statement — rule_conditions is a small per-family table. Tests added in test/models/rule/condition_test.rb cover the inclusion validation, the normalization callback, and the graceful-render path (uses update_columns to simulate a row written before the validation existed — that's the exact codepath that crashes /rules today). * test(rules): add system test for unsupported condition_type render + raise on migration down - test/system/rules_test.rb: visit /rules with a row whose condition_type has been update_columns'd to "name" — assert page renders and shows the "Unsupported (name)" label instead of raising. - db/migrate/...normalize_rule_condition_types.rb: replace the empty #down with `raise ActiveRecord::IrreversibleMigration` to match the repo's data-migration convention (see e.g. 20260219190000_scope_*). * chore(rules): log unsupported condition + cross-check supported types Address maintainer review on #1908: - Log a Rails.logger.warn (with rule_id and condition_type) from Rule::ConditionFilter::Unsupported#apply so silent zero-match rules are traceable when debugging. - Add a comment above Rule::Condition::SUPPORTED_CONDITION_TYPES and a test that cross-checks it against the registry's filter keys, so drift between the two surfaces as a failing test rather than a confusing validation error. * refactor(rules): derive supported condition types from registry --------- Co-authored-by: John Baillie <johnbaillie2007@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Khaostica <256858950+Khaostica@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: sure-admin <sure-admin@splashblot.com> |
||
|
|
7a86ee47c5 |
fix(goals): stop two goals from each claiming the same account in full (#3160)
* fix(goals): stop two goals from each claiming the same account in full
A GoalAccount with a NULL `allocated_amount` means "dedicate the whole
balance". Two of them on one account each claimed all of it, so the money
was counted twice:
Livret A, 6,000 precaution 6,000 vacances 6,000
progress: 100% progress: 100%
`Goal#backing_share_for` cannot catch this. Its pro-rata haircut only
scales FIXED earmarks, and an unallocated link contributes `nil.to_d` —
zero — to `others_fixed`, so the two links never see each other. The
invariant "shares never sum past the balance" held for every earmark
except the one that claims everything.
Enforce it at the door: GoalAccount now refuses a second whole-balance
link on an account another non-archived goal already claims in full, and
asks for an amount instead. The scope matches
`Goal.pooled_allocations_for` — archived goals are excluded from the
backing math, so they do not block; completed goals still hold their
money, so they do.
Rows written before this guard stay readable and editable. Autosave
revalidates every loaded goal_account on `goal.save`, so validating
untouched links would make a goal that merely holds a legacy overlap
impossible to rename. Only a new link, or one whose amount is being
cleared onto a contested account, is checked.
The goal fixtures encoded exactly the forbidden state — three goals
claiming `depository` in full — so tests that built a fourth whole
claim now use accounts of their own. `build_goal` mirrors the old
balance, leaving every KPI figure unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DJ1npaGEHr6t2HW1rYZdt4
* fix(goals): keep a restored goal from re-claiming an account in full
Addresses review feedback on #3160, raised independently on #3165, #3166 and
#3167 — one bug seen four times, because those branches stack.
Archiving a goal releases the accounts it claimed in full, so another goal can
legitimately claim one while it is away. Restoring it then put two
whole-account links back on the same account and reopened the double-counting
`whole_account_link_must_be_exclusive` closes: that check only fires when a
link is written, and a state change writes none.
A validation rather than an AASM guard. `may_fire_event?` stays true, the save
fails, and GoalsController#perform_transition! already surfaces
`errors.full_messages` — the user reads which goal holds the account instead of
a generic "can't do that in this state".
The conflict lookup now lives in one place, `Goal#whole_account_conflicts_on`,
read both by the door (writing a link) and by the restore, so the two cannot
drift into disagreeing about which goals still hold their money. The
`new_record? || will_save_change_to_allocated_amount?` bound stays on the
validation rather than moving into the shared lookup: it exists so a goal
merely holding a legacy overlap can still be renamed.
`Goal::RELEASED_STATES` replaces the repeated "archived" literal. The old
comment already said this scope had to move with the pool's; the constant makes
that true rather than hoped for, and the restore guard will follow the day the
set grows.
Restores from a released state are guarded; `resume` from `paused` is not. A
paused goal never let go of its accounts, so nothing can legitimately have
claimed one meanwhile, and blocking it would strand a user on a goal they
merely shelved.
Two things this surfaced in the test data:
- The fixtures had three goals each claiming `depository` in full — the exact
state the rule forbids. `test "AASM transitions"` failed on it, a true
positive. Two of them now take a fixed 1,000 slice.
- `current_balance sums linked account balances` asserted the gross balance,
which only held because of that overlap. A whole-account link takes what is
left after other goals' fixed earmarks; the test now says so, and computes it
from the data rather than a constant.
Each guard was confirmed load-bearing by removing it and watching its test
fail. bin/rails test: 6936 runs, 27911 assertions, 0 failures. RuboCop,
erb_lint and Brakeman clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye
* fix(goals): treat moving a whole-account link as the fresh claim it is
Addresses review feedback on #3160.
The exclusivity check was bounded to `new_record? ||
will_save_change_to_allocated_amount?`. A persisted whole-account row whose
`account_id` or `goal_id` changes is neither, so moving one landed it on an
account nobody had checked — the same double-counting hole a restore opened,
through a different door.
The bound is widened rather than dropped. It exists because `Goal has_many
:goal_accounts, autosave: true` revalidates every loaded child on `goal.save`,
so an unguarded check makes a goal that merely holds a legacy overlap
impossible to rename. That reason still holds for every row along for the ride;
it does not hold for a row being moved. A test pins both faces.
bin/rails test: 6939 runs, 27916 assertions, 0 failures. RuboCop and Brakeman
clean. Confirmed load-bearing by narrowing the bound back and watching the move
test fail.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016GTNba5qE5NwzaHzbp27ye
* fix(goals): stop a link that is changing goals from conflicting with itself
Addresses review feedback on #3160, on the widening that landed in
|
||
|
|
ed28fab807 |
fix(trades): let the header call a trade what the importer recorded (#3150)
The header derived its wording from the amount's sign and ignored investment_activity_label, except for Dividend and Interest. So every other labelled trade was announced as a buy or a sell: a Questrade journal, which records "Transfer", opened as a purchase it never was. The label now wins when this view has wording for it, and the sign remains the fallback for a trade with no label, or one carrying a label this view does not name. `I18n.exists?` guards that second case, so an unknown label degrades to buy/sell rather than rendering a missing-translation string. Wording added for the rest of Trade::ACTIVITY_LABELS. English only: fallbacks are enabled application-wide, so the other seventeen locales inherit it rather than raising. Not fixed by this, in case the title suggests otherwise: Kraken records its Contribution and Withdrawal labels on Transactions, not Trades, so it never reaches this view — its labels already display through the quick-edit badge. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
3d6a8d8b6e |
feat(budgets): move money between envelopes in one gesture (#3164)
* feat(budgets): carry a category's unspent budget into the next month
A budget category resets to zero every month, so anything non-monthly
(annual insurance, a holiday fund, car servicing) has no place to
accumulate. Two columns on budget_categories turn a category into a real
envelope: `rollover_enabled`, opt-in per category and off by default, and
`rolled_over_amount`, the surplus carried in from the previous month.
rolled_over(n) = rollover_enabled
? max(0, budgeted(n-1) + rolled_over(n-1) - actual(n-1))
: 0
v1 floors at zero: only a surplus carries, never an overspend.
The amount is materialized, not derived. March depends on February which
depends on January, so computing it on read would walk the whole chain on
every budget render. Budget::RolloverCalculator recomputes it in a single
forward pass and writes once via upsert_all, from Budget.find_or_bootstrap
and from BudgetCategoriesController#update -- allocations and the toggle
being the only inputs. No Transaction hook: a past month's actuals can
change after the fact, and the page load is a fine moment to catch up.
Scope kept deliberately narrow. `Budget#budgeted_spending`,
`#allocated_spending` and `#available_to_allocate` are untouched -- the top
of the budget page still answers "I planned to spend X, I've allocated Y".
The carry is per-envelope information, surfaced as `Budget#total_rolled_over`
and never folded into those totals.
What the carry does change is consumption: `available_to_spend`,
`percent_of_budget_spent` and `budgeted?` all count it, or a category funded
entirely by rollover would read as unbudgeted and get an alert pill while it
still had money left. `display_budgeted_spending` stays the month's
allocation alone -- the card shows the two figures side by side.
Details worth knowing:
- A parent's carry is net of its ring-fenced subcategories'. A parent's
allocation already contains theirs and its actuals already contain their
spending; those subcategories carry their own surplus, so counting the
parent's raw leftover would roll the same money over twice.
- Chains never mix: household with household, a member's personal budgets
with their own. A missing month is a gap the carry crosses, not a month
budgeted at zero.
- The carry stops at a currency change. sync_budget_categories stamps
categories with family.currency at sync time while a budget freezes its
own at creation, so the guard is on budget_category.currency -- the unit
the amount is actually denominated in.
- upsert_all writes with `update_only`, so a concurrent request that moves
an allocation between our read and our write doesn't get it clobbered by
the stale value we loaded.
- copy_from! copies the toggle, never the amount.
Cost for families that never turn it on: one EXISTS query per budget page
load, measured, including on the reports page which also bootstraps a
budget. With rollover on, the walk starts at the first month that uses it
rather than at the two-year history bound.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CyD26wsXjsYfpTgAGL1n1Z
* fix(budgets): pin the household rollover chain to a viewer-independent scope
Addresses review feedback on #3143.
The household budget (user_id NULL) has no owner to scope actuals by, and
`IncomeStatement` falls back to `Current.user` when nobody says otherwise.
The calculator therefore computed one shared `rolled_over_amount` through
whichever member happened to load the page, and each viewer overwrote the
other's number -- last one wins, and a member could infer spending in
accounts they cannot see. `Budget#income_statement_accounts` can now be
overridden, and the calculator pins the household chain to the whole
family so the shared row holds one number. Personal chains are untouched:
they already scope to their owner's accounts and were always deterministic.
`copy_from!` runs after `find_or_bootstrap` has already recomputed the
chain, so copying `rollover_enabled` left the target sitting on a zero carry
until the next page load. It now recomputes before its transaction commits.
The toggle tooltip described the wrong direction. `incoming_carry` checks
the flag of the month being computed, so the toggle governs what that month
*receives* from the previous one, not what it sends forward. Reworded in
English and French.
The concurrency regression test now drives its concurrent write through
`Budget#budget_category_actual_spending`, a public seam, instead of stubbing
a private method of the calculator from another class's test suite.
Each guard was confirmed load-bearing by reverting it and watching its test
fail. bin/rails test: 6939 runs, 0 failures.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CyD26wsXjsYfpTgAGL1n1Z
* fix(budgets): let the rollover choice stand instead of resetting each month
`rollover_enabled` lives on budget_categories, one row per (budget,
category), so a month created by `find_or_bootstrap` was born with the flag
off. Switching rollover on for Vacations in January and simply opening
February dropped January's surplus on the floor -- the user had to re-arm
the toggle every month, or go through "copy from previous budget". The
feature's headline case, a category funded 50/month accumulating over a
year, did not work as shipped.
New rows now inherit the flag from the last initialized budget of the same
owner, the same chain the carry itself walks. Turning the toggle off on a
given month still overrides it from there on, so the per-month escape hatch
survives.
The flag stays on budget_categories rather than moving to Category, which is
where comparable products (Monarch, Copilot, Lunch Money) put it. Categories
here are family-wide while budgets are per owner, so a category-level flag
would force one member's rollover choice onto everyone's personal budget and
onto the household budget. budget_categories is the only table carrying both
the category and the owner. A regression test covers that isolation.
Naming follows the same products: the toggle reads "Rollover", the noun, not
"Roll over", the verb -- which also matches `rollover_enabled` and the
calculator. Both tooltips now describe the property rather than a direction
("keep this category's unspent money from one month to the next"). The
previous wording named the direction the flag actually gates, incoming,
which is accurate but the opposite of the mental model every comparable
product installs; describing the property is true under either reading. The
French card string switched to "+%{amount} de report" so it no longer has to
agree in number with a currency noun it cannot see.
bin/rails test: 6942 runs, 0 failures. The inheritance was confirmed
load-bearing by removing it and watching its tests fail.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CyD26wsXjsYfpTgAGL1n1Z
* fix(budgets): make a rollover opt-out stop the money in both directions
`incoming_carry` gates what a month receives, but `leftover_for` computed
what it sends regardless of the toggle. So switching rollover off for one
month and back on the next handed the opted-out month's whole allocation to
the month after: the surplus the user meant to forfeit reappeared a month
later. Reproduced at 100, where 0 was expected.
The outgoing carry is now gated on the same flag, which also skips the
actuals lookup for opted-out rows. "Off" now means this envelope does not
roll over, in either direction -- the reading the standing toggle and the
tooltip both promise.
Found by CodeRabbit on #3143. It only became wrong with the standing-choice
inheritance in
|
||
|
|
1fddb4d97c |
feat(budgets): carry a category's unspent budget into the next month (#3143)
* feat(budgets): carry a category's unspent budget into the next month
A budget category resets to zero every month, so anything non-monthly
(annual insurance, a holiday fund, car servicing) has no place to
accumulate. Two columns on budget_categories turn a category into a real
envelope: `rollover_enabled`, opt-in per category and off by default, and
`rolled_over_amount`, the surplus carried in from the previous month.
rolled_over(n) = rollover_enabled
? max(0, budgeted(n-1) + rolled_over(n-1) - actual(n-1))
: 0
v1 floors at zero: only a surplus carries, never an overspend.
The amount is materialized, not derived. March depends on February which
depends on January, so computing it on read would walk the whole chain on
every budget render. Budget::RolloverCalculator recomputes it in a single
forward pass and writes once via upsert_all, from Budget.find_or_bootstrap
and from BudgetCategoriesController#update -- allocations and the toggle
being the only inputs. No Transaction hook: a past month's actuals can
change after the fact, and the page load is a fine moment to catch up.
Scope kept deliberately narrow. `Budget#budgeted_spending`,
`#allocated_spending` and `#available_to_allocate` are untouched -- the top
of the budget page still answers "I planned to spend X, I've allocated Y".
The carry is per-envelope information, surfaced as `Budget#total_rolled_over`
and never folded into those totals.
What the carry does change is consumption: `available_to_spend`,
`percent_of_budget_spent` and `budgeted?` all count it, or a category funded
entirely by rollover would read as unbudgeted and get an alert pill while it
still had money left. `display_budgeted_spending` stays the month's
allocation alone -- the card shows the two figures side by side.
Details worth knowing:
- A parent's carry is net of its ring-fenced subcategories'. A parent's
allocation already contains theirs and its actuals already contain their
spending; those subcategories carry their own surplus, so counting the
parent's raw leftover would roll the same money over twice.
- Chains never mix: household with household, a member's personal budgets
with their own. A missing month is a gap the carry crosses, not a month
budgeted at zero.
- The carry stops at a currency change. sync_budget_categories stamps
categories with family.currency at sync time while a budget freezes its
own at creation, so the guard is on budget_category.currency -- the unit
the amount is actually denominated in.
- upsert_all writes with `update_only`, so a concurrent request that moves
an allocation between our read and our write doesn't get it clobbered by
the stale value we loaded.
- copy_from! copies the toggle, never the amount.
Cost for families that never turn it on: one EXISTS query per budget page
load, measured, including on the reports page which also bootstraps a
budget. With rollover on, the walk starts at the first month that uses it
rather than at the two-year history bound.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CyD26wsXjsYfpTgAGL1n1Z
* fix(budgets): pin the household rollover chain to a viewer-independent scope
Addresses review feedback on #3143.
The household budget (user_id NULL) has no owner to scope actuals by, and
`IncomeStatement` falls back to `Current.user` when nobody says otherwise.
The calculator therefore computed one shared `rolled_over_amount` through
whichever member happened to load the page, and each viewer overwrote the
other's number -- last one wins, and a member could infer spending in
accounts they cannot see. `Budget#income_statement_accounts` can now be
overridden, and the calculator pins the household chain to the whole
family so the shared row holds one number. Personal chains are untouched:
they already scope to their owner's accounts and were always deterministic.
`copy_from!` runs after `find_or_bootstrap` has already recomputed the
chain, so copying `rollover_enabled` left the target sitting on a zero carry
until the next page load. It now recomputes before its transaction commits.
The toggle tooltip described the wrong direction. `incoming_carry` checks
the flag of the month being computed, so the toggle governs what that month
*receives* from the previous one, not what it sends forward. Reworded in
English and French.
The concurrency regression test now drives its concurrent write through
`Budget#budget_category_actual_spending`, a public seam, instead of stubbing
a private method of the calculator from another class's test suite.
Each guard was confirmed load-bearing by reverting it and watching its test
fail. bin/rails test: 6939 runs, 0 failures.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CyD26wsXjsYfpTgAGL1n1Z
* fix(budgets): let the rollover choice stand instead of resetting each month
`rollover_enabled` lives on budget_categories, one row per (budget,
category), so a month created by `find_or_bootstrap` was born with the flag
off. Switching rollover on for Vacations in January and simply opening
February dropped January's surplus on the floor -- the user had to re-arm
the toggle every month, or go through "copy from previous budget". The
feature's headline case, a category funded 50/month accumulating over a
year, did not work as shipped.
New rows now inherit the flag from the last initialized budget of the same
owner, the same chain the carry itself walks. Turning the toggle off on a
given month still overrides it from there on, so the per-month escape hatch
survives.
The flag stays on budget_categories rather than moving to Category, which is
where comparable products (Monarch, Copilot, Lunch Money) put it. Categories
here are family-wide while budgets are per owner, so a category-level flag
would force one member's rollover choice onto everyone's personal budget and
onto the household budget. budget_categories is the only table carrying both
the category and the owner. A regression test covers that isolation.
Naming follows the same products: the toggle reads "Rollover", the noun, not
"Roll over", the verb -- which also matches `rollover_enabled` and the
calculator. Both tooltips now describe the property rather than a direction
("keep this category's unspent money from one month to the next"). The
previous wording named the direction the flag actually gates, incoming,
which is accurate but the opposite of the mental model every comparable
product installs; describing the property is true under either reading. The
French card string switched to "+%{amount} de report" so it no longer has to
agree in number with a currency noun it cannot see.
bin/rails test: 6942 runs, 0 failures. The inheritance was confirmed
load-bearing by removing it and watching its tests fail.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CyD26wsXjsYfpTgAGL1n1Z
* fix(budgets): make a rollover opt-out stop the money in both directions
`incoming_carry` gates what a month receives, but `leftover_for` computed
what it sends regardless of the toggle. So switching rollover off for one
month and back on the next handed the opted-out month's whole allocation to
the month after: the surplus the user meant to forfeit reappeared a month
later. Reproduced at 100, where 0 was expected.
The outgoing carry is now gated on the same flag, which also skips the
actuals lookup for opted-out rows. "Off" now means this envelope does not
roll over, in either direction -- the reading the standing toggle and the
tooltip both promise.
Found by CodeRabbit on #3143. It only became wrong with the standing-choice
inheritance in
|
||
|
|
3bdfe9521e |
Fix AI health check for OpenAI-compatible endpoints (#3184)
* Fix AI health probe for OpenAI-compatible endpoints * Stabilize accounts sync system test * Address AI health probe review feedback |
||
|
|
0a7c1107fd |
fix(i18n): add missing Italian translations (#3170)
* Add missing IT translations * Update config/locales/views/insights/it.yml Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Alessio Cappa <104093777+alessiocappa@users.noreply.github.com> * Update config/locales/views/layout/it.yml Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Alessio Cappa <104093777+alessiocappa@users.noreply.github.com> * Add plural variants for count-bearing messages. * Fix indentation for insights key in Italian locale Signed-off-by: Alessio Cappa <104093777+alessiocappa@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Alessio Cappa <104093777+alessiocappa@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
cb283c54c6 |
Bump version to next iteration after v0.7.4-alpha.9 release (#3173)
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
b438a1c8dd | Improve chat tracking and system test assertions | ||
|
|
54b5589745 | Document user_modified transaction field in OpenAPI specs | ||
|
|
b1df16b0a7 |
Allow API transaction create to opt into sync protection (user_modified) (#3162)
* Allow API transaction create to opt into sync protection (user_modified) The transactions API has no way to mark a newly-created transaction user_modified, which is the only thing that protects an entry from a later provider sync (Plaid/SimpleFin/etc.) silently overwriting its category or name - Account::ProviderImportAdapter#import_transaction claims any entry matching on date/amount/currency with no external_id yet, then enriches unlocked fields from the sync payload. This matters for any API client that owns writes into an account also linked to a bank-sync provider: without a way to protect its own entries, the client's data can be silently overwritten the first time the linked provider happens to sync a matching transaction. Adds an optional `user_modified` param to POST /api/v1/transactions, reusing the existing Entry#mark_user_modified! (added for #1977, so far only wired into the merchant merge/convert/unlink flows) rather than mass-assigning the column directly. Exposes user_modified in the transaction JSON response, matching how external_id/source already are. Scoped to create only, matching the concrete need; happy to extend to update in a follow-up if that's wanted too. * fix: mark entry user_modified before enqueueing account sync sync_account_later enqueued the background sync job before mark_user_modified! ran, leaving a window where a fast-running job could read and overwrite the entry before the protection flag was set. Move the mark_user_modified! call ahead of the sync enqueue so the flag is always in place first. |
||
|
+2 |
225f72ad81 |
Rename native Swift app to Sure Insights (#3172)
* Add Swift-native Sure app * Fix push subscriptions schema for CI * Rename native app to Sure Insights * Add Sure Insights App Store listing * Add supported interface orientations * chore(goals): drop copy-pasted duplicates and an unused lock-key helper (#3159) `Account#goal_earmarked_total` and `Account#free_to_earmark` were each defined twice, byte for byte, with no `private` boundary or singleton class between the blocks — a copy-paste artifact where the second definition silently overwrote the first. Keep one copy of each. `Goal.advisory_lock_key_for` had no caller anywhere in app/; the only reference was a test asserting the dead helper was deterministic. Remove both. No behavior change. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DJ1npaGEHr6t2HW1rYZdt4 Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Add live AI checks to system health (#3155) * Add live AI checks to system health Give super admins a dedicated AI status view with bounded liveness probes for LLMs, vector stores, pgvector, and embedding endpoints. Record sanitized failures in both the system debug log and Rails logger, and document the recommended local configuration.\n\nCloses #3145 * Fix AI health CI checks * Address AI health review feedback * Correct Ollama model preload guidance * Distinguish OpenAI-compatible providers * Make Ollama startup readiness explicit * Recognize Cloudflare AI endpoints * fix(lunchflow): mark sync unhealthy when importer reports fetch failures (#1796) (#1873) * fix(lunchflow): mark sync unhealthy when importer reports fetch failures (#1796) `LunchflowItem::Syncer#perform_sync` called `lunchflow_item.import_latest_lunchflow_data` but threw the result away and then ran `collect_health_stats(sync, errors: nil)`. The importer already catches per-account 429/500 fetch errors, bumps a `transactions_failed` counter, and returns `success: false` — but the syncer never inspected the return value, so the parent sync was marked completed/green even when zero transactions were imported because every fetch had been rate-limited. Capture the importer result and translate any `accounts_failed` / `transactions_failed` / `error` fields into the `{ message:, category: }` error shape `collect_health_stats` expects. The exception-path `rescue` branch is unchanged. Closes #1796 * test(lunchflow): i18n the new health messages + add syncer invariant tests (#1796) Two pieces of follow-up feedback: - @coderabbitai + @JSONbored: the three new operator-facing strings should go through I18n.t. Add keys under provider_warnings.lunchflow_* (matching the existing provider_warnings.limited_investment_data shape) and use Rails pluralization for the count-bearing entries. Other locales follow the repo's normal translation flow. - @jjmata + @JSONbored: add tests for the invariants. New LunchflowItem::SyncerTest covers: * successful import → sync healthy * accounts_failed positive → sync unhealthy with localized message * transactions_failed positive → sync unhealthy with localized message * both counters positive → both error entries recorded in order * sync raises → sync_error category + reraise (existing rescue branch) @jjmata also asked to confirm the importer contract: LunchflowItem::Importer#import returns 'success: accounts_failed == 0 && transactions_failed == 0' (see importer.rb), so the early 'return [] if import_result[:success]' guard is safe — success is never true while either counter is positive. --------- Co-authored-by: jeffrey701 <jeffrey701@users.noreply.github.com> * Exclude pending transactions from balances (#2897) * Exclude pending transactions from balances * Fix balance regression assertions * Add pending balance review regressions * Fix merge conflict commit --------- Signed-off-by: Juan José Mata <juanjo.mata@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Juan José Mata <juanjo.mata@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Juan José Mata <jjmata@jjmata.com> * perf: memoize Family#balance_sheet/investment_statement, cache transactions-index side queries (#3058) * perf: memoize Family#balance_sheet/investment_statement, cache transactions-index side queries The account sidebar renders on every page (mobile + desktop, 3 tabs each) and calls Family#balance_sheet multiple times per render; neither it nor Family#investment_statement/InvestmentStatement#current_holdings were memoized, so each call rebuilt the underlying query from scratch. Memoize both per-user (family sharing means different users must not share a cached BalanceSheet/InvestmentStatement). Also cache TransactionsController#index's uncategorized_count and projected_recurring lookups, which run unconditionally on every request regardless of whether the underlying data changed, using the same entries_cache_version-keyed pattern already used elsewhere in the codebase (e.g. Transaction::Search#totals). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: address PR #3058 review feedback on cache invalidation and query reuse - Invalidate transactions-index caches when the current user's AccountShare access changes, not just on entries/recurring updates (CodeRabbit/Codex flagged revoked users could see stale data for up to a day). - Use full-precision timestamps instead of to_i in the cache keys so same-second updates aren't missed. - Reuse the already-memoized investment_account_ids in InvestmentStatement#current_holdings instead of an extra any? query. - Assert the rendered response instead of a controller instance variable in the uncategorized_count test, per CodeRabbit nitpick. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: assert rendered response, not implementation details, in PR #3058 tests Two CodeRabbit nitpicks from the second review round: the uncategorized-count cache-reuse assertion matched a scope name that never appears in generated SQL (making it vacuous), and the recurring-cache revocation test read the controller's private @projected_recurring ivar instead of the rendered page. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: bust transactions-index caches on entry/recurring deletion and account status change jjmata's PR review flagged two invalidation gaps: hard-deleting an uncategorized entry or recurring transaction left the previous max updated_at unchanged (cache never busted), and toggling an account's active status doesn't touch entries/AccountShare at all. Fold in counts (like account_share_version already did) and a new Family#accounts_status_version, and move the version helpers onto Family/Current per the "fat models, skinny controllers" nit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: include merchant version in projected_recurring cache key Editing or deleting a FamilyMerchant doesn't touch recurring_transactions, so the cached projected-recurring list (rendered with merchant name/logo, expires_in: 1.day) could show stale merchant data for up to a day. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(transactions): version projected-recurring cache by referenced merchants, not just FamilyMerchant recurring_transactions.merchant_id can point at a shared ProviderMerchant (recurring detection copies transaction.merchant_id), not just a family-owned FamilyMerchant. merchants_version only tracked Family#merchants (FamilyMerchant), so a ProviderMerchant update (e.g. ProviderMerchant::Enhancer setting name/logo) left the cached projected recurring list stale for up to a day. Replace Family#merchants_version with #recurring_transaction_merchants_version, scoped to the merchant records actually referenced by the family's recurring transactions (both FamilyMerchant and ProviderMerchant), and bump the cache key version. Also fix a flaky test assertion that matched all recurring_transactions-table queries instead of the actual projection query, since computing the cache key itself still runs small COUNT/MAX queries against that table on a cache hit. --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Gerald <248542187+gfr-free@users.noreply.github.com> * Fix budget cache invalidation after transaction deletion (#2808) Signed-off-by: Juan José Mata <juanjo.mata@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Juan José Mata <juanjo.mata@gmail.com> * Add experimental Swift-native Sure Insights app (#3134) * Add Swift-native Sure app * Fix push subscriptions schema for CI * Address native app review feedback * Address remaining native app review feedback * Use Flutter app logo for native icon * Honor insight notification preferences and locale --------- Co-authored-by: Juan Jose Mata <2v8shcb6pz@privaterelay.appleid.com> Co-authored-by: sure-admin <sure-admin@splashblot.com> * Refresh welcome screen branding * Align welcome screen with brand green * Remove welcome navigation title * Center welcome screen logo * Enlarge welcome screen logo * Label fallback insights as samples * Rename conversations menu label * Add experimental Swift-native Sure Insights app (#3134) * Add Swift-native Sure app * Fix push subscriptions schema for CI * Address native app review feedback * Address remaining native app review feedback * Use Flutter app logo for native icon * Honor insight notification preferences and locale --------- Co-authored-by: Juan Jose Mata <2v8shcb6pz@privaterelay.appleid.com> Co-authored-by: sure-admin <sure-admin@splashblot.com> * feat(snaptrade): add device-flow OAuth alongside the browser redirect (#3126) * feat(snaptrade): add device-flow OAuth alongside the browser redirect SnapTrade could only be connected through the authorization-code + PKCE flow, which needs a confidential OAuth client: SNAPTRADE_OAUTH_CLIENT_SECRET and a redirect URI registered on the OAuth app. A deployment that cannot register one had no path at all. Add the device grant (RFC 8628) as a second way to obtain the same token, so people can pick the flow that suits their deployment. Both grants end at SnaptradeItem#apply_oauth_tokens!, so a device-authorized item is indistinguishable from a redirect-authorized one from there on -- same Bearer data calls, refresh, revocation and sync. Nothing about existing authorized items changes: no schema change, no migration, and the PKCE path is untouched. - Provider::Snaptrade gains start_device_authorization and poll_device_token, with endpoints read from SnapTrade's OAuth metadata document (cached). - oauth_configured? now means "some flow is available" (public client id), which is what gates syncing and the provider panel; the new authorization_code_configured? gates the redirect flow specifically. - Token and revocation requests authenticate as a public client when no secret is configured -- client_id in the body instead of HTTP Basic. Without this a device-authorized item would authorize fine and then fail at its first token rotation. - The settings panel offers both when both are available; every other entry point picks one through SnaptradeItemsHelper#snaptrade_authorize_path. - The device page carries a failed attempt's code back into the form, so "not confirmed yet" is a retry rather than a restart. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X3f2UyefTKJrgvNjPnhMRk * fix(snaptrade): keep the provider panel's setup-step keys and cover both flows Two test_unit failures from the panel change. The setup steps were reordered and their keys renamed, which orphaned the translations twelve locales already had for them and broke the test asserting `oauth_setup_step_3`. The rename bought nothing: reword the steps in place instead, leaving the callback URL on step 2 where the interpolation lives. The panel tests stubbed `oauth_configured?`, which no longer decides which buttons render -- that is now `authorization_code_configured?`. Stub both, so the "configured" cases test the deployment they name, and add the device-only case that was previously unreachable. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X3f2UyefTKJrgvNjPnhMRk * fix(snaptrade): address device-flow review findings Two real bugs from the bot reviews, plus consistency work. The completion form posts into the `drawer` frame so errors re-render in place, but a successful redirect was then followed as a frame navigation. Both destinations carry the layout's empty `drawer` frame, so Turbo swapped that in and merely closed the dialog: the notice was lost and `return_to=setup_accounts` never advanced. Success now breaks out with a redirect stream action, the same mechanism holdings and categorizes already use, while errors keep rendering in the drawer. RFC 8628 §3.1 requires a confidential client to authenticate its device authorization request, and the panel offers the device code on deployments that configured a secret. That request now carries the same client authentication as the token request. Token endpoint resolution is now shared by all three grants, since whatever issued a token has to be what refreshes it. It reads the discovery document only when already cached and never fetches it, so the browser flow keeps working off the constant it has always used -- no new network call on refresh and no new way for an existing authorized item to fail. Also: the drawer no longer asks the provider whether it is configured, the controller tells it; and the test helpers restore the previous OAuth config rather than clearing it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X3f2UyefTKJrgvNjPnhMRk * fix(snaptrade): reject a device authorization response that cannot drive the flow A 2xx missing device_code, user_code or a verification URI was passed straight to the drawer, which then rendered a blank code and a link to nowhere -- a dead end the user could only abandon. Every one of those fields is load-bearing, and a response without them is partial or schema-changed, so fail with a message instead. Same reasoning as the results-array check in get_positions. verification_uri_complete substitutes for verification_uri when present, since the drawer prefers it for the link anyway. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X3f2UyefTKJrgvNjPnhMRk * fix(snaptrade): filter device-flow codes from request logs complete_oauth_device_flow receives the device code as a request parameter, and none of the existing filter_parameters patterns is a substring of "device_code" -- ParameterFilter matches on substrings, and "token", "_key", "secret", "code_verifier" and "code_challenge" all miss it. So Rails' default "Processing by ... Parameters: {...}" line was writing it in plaintext. That matters more here than ordinary log hygiene: the device code is the only capability check on redemption. Unlike the redirect flow's state, nothing binds a device code to the family that requested it, so anyone who can read the logs could redeem another family's in-flight authorization into their own item and pick up a token for that family's brokerage data. Adds :device_code, :user_code and :verification_uri_complete (which embeds the user code) to the filter list, with a regression test in the style of the existing Sophtron credential-filtering test. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X3f2UyefTKJrgvNjPnhMRk * fix(snaptrade): bind a pending device authorization to its session The device code was posted back from the drawer as a form field, so the request body was the only thing deciding which item a pending authorization redeemed into. Nothing tied a code to the family that asked for it -- the guarantee `state` gives the redirect flow -- so a code recovered from anywhere could be redeemed into an item belonging to someone else, handing them a token for the victim's brokerage data. Hold the pending authorization in the session instead, where oauth_callback already keeps its code_verifier and state: - start_oauth_device_flow records the code, what the page displays, the family, the item and the return_to context under :snaptrade_device_flow. - complete_oauth_device_flow reads the code from there and refuses unless the flow was started by this session for this family and this item. A device_code parameter is no longer read at all, so there is no longer a way to inject one. - return_to and accountable_type come from the session too, so completion needs nothing from the form to find its way back. The code now never reaches the browser, which also makes the previous commit's log filtering a second line of defence rather than the only one. A failed attempt keeps the code only while it is still redeemable: expired_token and access_denied clear it so the page offers a fresh start, while a transient failure leaves it in place to retry. expires_in and interval are no longer carried anywhere, since nothing ever read them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X3f2UyefTKJrgvNjPnhMRk * fix(snaptrade): use one token endpoint for every grant poll_device_token resolved the token endpoint from the cached discovery document while exchange_code and refresh_tokens used TOKEN_URL, so which URL a device-issued token was refreshed at depended on whether the 12h metadata cache was still warm. If the discovered endpoint ever differed from the constant, a device-authorized item would work until the cache lapsed and then fail its first rotation -- and fail invisibly, since a refresh failure marks the connection requires_update. Resolve it by removing the choice rather than by making refresh depend on discovery. RFC 8628 §3.4 redeems a device code at the authorization server's token endpoint, the same one the authorization code grant uses: there is one token endpoint, not one per grant, and nothing to keep in sync between issuing a token and refreshing it. TOKEN_URL is also the endpoint the browser flow has been using in production, so it is the one with evidence behind it. Discovery is still consulted, but only for device_authorization_endpoint, which has no hardcoded equivalent. This also keeps refresh free of any network dependency it did not already have: reintroducing discovery there would have put a fetch, with retries and backoff, in front of every token rotation on items that never needed one. Also restore the previous OAuth configuration in the missing-client-id test instead of leaving the client id nil, which made it order-dependent. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X3f2UyefTKJrgvNjPnhMRk --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(mcp): support Streamable HTTP transport (protocol 2025-06-18) (#2631) * feat(mcp): support Streamable HTTP transport (protocol 2025-06-18) Bumps the MCP protocol version from 2025-03-26 to 2025-06-18 to support clients using the Streamable HTTP transport, notably Bifrost v1.6.3+. Changes: - Add after_action hook to set Mcp-Protocol-Version header on all responses - Generate and return a sessionId in the initialize response - Set Mcp-Session-Id header on subsequent responses Without these headers, Bifrost's MCP client retries the initialize handshake 5 times and ultimately fails with a context deadline exceeded error, even though every JSON-RPC message is processed correctly. * test: update mcp protocol expectations * fix(mcp): negotiate protocol versions * fix(mcp): align transport error responses --------- Co-authored-by: secretsound <secretsound@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: sure-admin <sure-admin@splashblot.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Juan José Mata <juanjo.mata@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Juan Jose Mata <2v8shcb6pz@privaterelay.appleid.com> Co-authored-by: sure-admin <sure-admin@splashblot.com> Co-authored-by: buzzromain <18685603+buzzromain@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Jeff <158072326+jeffrey701@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: jeffrey701 <jeffrey701@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Atlas <atlas@maximusjb.com> Co-authored-by: GFR <gerald-fritz@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: Gerald <248542187+gfr-free@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Luke Blankenship <theLASTone413@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: secretsound <secretsound@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
3a50846cc7 |
feat(mcp): support Streamable HTTP transport (protocol 2025-06-18) (#2631)
* feat(mcp): support Streamable HTTP transport (protocol 2025-06-18) Bumps the MCP protocol version from 2025-03-26 to 2025-06-18 to support clients using the Streamable HTTP transport, notably Bifrost v1.6.3+. Changes: - Add after_action hook to set Mcp-Protocol-Version header on all responses - Generate and return a sessionId in the initialize response - Set Mcp-Session-Id header on subsequent responses Without these headers, Bifrost's MCP client retries the initialize handshake 5 times and ultimately fails with a context deadline exceeded error, even though every JSON-RPC message is processed correctly. * test: update mcp protocol expectations * fix(mcp): negotiate protocol versions * fix(mcp): align transport error responses --------- Co-authored-by: secretsound <secretsound@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: sure-admin <sure-admin@splashblot.com> |
||
|
|
d6462f5fc9 |
feat(snaptrade): add device-flow OAuth alongside the browser redirect (#3126)
* feat(snaptrade): add device-flow OAuth alongside the browser redirect SnapTrade could only be connected through the authorization-code + PKCE flow, which needs a confidential OAuth client: SNAPTRADE_OAUTH_CLIENT_SECRET and a redirect URI registered on the OAuth app. A deployment that cannot register one had no path at all. Add the device grant (RFC 8628) as a second way to obtain the same token, so people can pick the flow that suits their deployment. Both grants end at SnaptradeItem#apply_oauth_tokens!, so a device-authorized item is indistinguishable from a redirect-authorized one from there on -- same Bearer data calls, refresh, revocation and sync. Nothing about existing authorized items changes: no schema change, no migration, and the PKCE path is untouched. - Provider::Snaptrade gains start_device_authorization and poll_device_token, with endpoints read from SnapTrade's OAuth metadata document (cached). - oauth_configured? now means "some flow is available" (public client id), which is what gates syncing and the provider panel; the new authorization_code_configured? gates the redirect flow specifically. - Token and revocation requests authenticate as a public client when no secret is configured -- client_id in the body instead of HTTP Basic. Without this a device-authorized item would authorize fine and then fail at its first token rotation. - The settings panel offers both when both are available; every other entry point picks one through SnaptradeItemsHelper#snaptrade_authorize_path. - The device page carries a failed attempt's code back into the form, so "not confirmed yet" is a retry rather than a restart. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X3f2UyefTKJrgvNjPnhMRk * fix(snaptrade): keep the provider panel's setup-step keys and cover both flows Two test_unit failures from the panel change. The setup steps were reordered and their keys renamed, which orphaned the translations twelve locales already had for them and broke the test asserting `oauth_setup_step_3`. The rename bought nothing: reword the steps in place instead, leaving the callback URL on step 2 where the interpolation lives. The panel tests stubbed `oauth_configured?`, which no longer decides which buttons render -- that is now `authorization_code_configured?`. Stub both, so the "configured" cases test the deployment they name, and add the device-only case that was previously unreachable. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X3f2UyefTKJrgvNjPnhMRk * fix(snaptrade): address device-flow review findings Two real bugs from the bot reviews, plus consistency work. The completion form posts into the `drawer` frame so errors re-render in place, but a successful redirect was then followed as a frame navigation. Both destinations carry the layout's empty `drawer` frame, so Turbo swapped that in and merely closed the dialog: the notice was lost and `return_to=setup_accounts` never advanced. Success now breaks out with a redirect stream action, the same mechanism holdings and categorizes already use, while errors keep rendering in the drawer. RFC 8628 §3.1 requires a confidential client to authenticate its device authorization request, and the panel offers the device code on deployments that configured a secret. That request now carries the same client authentication as the token request. Token endpoint resolution is now shared by all three grants, since whatever issued a token has to be what refreshes it. It reads the discovery document only when already cached and never fetches it, so the browser flow keeps working off the constant it has always used -- no new network call on refresh and no new way for an existing authorized item to fail. Also: the drawer no longer asks the provider whether it is configured, the controller tells it; and the test helpers restore the previous OAuth config rather than clearing it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X3f2UyefTKJrgvNjPnhMRk * fix(snaptrade): reject a device authorization response that cannot drive the flow A 2xx missing device_code, user_code or a verification URI was passed straight to the drawer, which then rendered a blank code and a link to nowhere -- a dead end the user could only abandon. Every one of those fields is load-bearing, and a response without them is partial or schema-changed, so fail with a message instead. Same reasoning as the results-array check in get_positions. verification_uri_complete substitutes for verification_uri when present, since the drawer prefers it for the link anyway. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X3f2UyefTKJrgvNjPnhMRk * fix(snaptrade): filter device-flow codes from request logs complete_oauth_device_flow receives the device code as a request parameter, and none of the existing filter_parameters patterns is a substring of "device_code" -- ParameterFilter matches on substrings, and "token", "_key", "secret", "code_verifier" and "code_challenge" all miss it. So Rails' default "Processing by ... Parameters: {...}" line was writing it in plaintext. That matters more here than ordinary log hygiene: the device code is the only capability check on redemption. Unlike the redirect flow's state, nothing binds a device code to the family that requested it, so anyone who can read the logs could redeem another family's in-flight authorization into their own item and pick up a token for that family's brokerage data. Adds :device_code, :user_code and :verification_uri_complete (which embeds the user code) to the filter list, with a regression test in the style of the existing Sophtron credential-filtering test. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X3f2UyefTKJrgvNjPnhMRk * fix(snaptrade): bind a pending device authorization to its session The device code was posted back from the drawer as a form field, so the request body was the only thing deciding which item a pending authorization redeemed into. Nothing tied a code to the family that asked for it -- the guarantee `state` gives the redirect flow -- so a code recovered from anywhere could be redeemed into an item belonging to someone else, handing them a token for the victim's brokerage data. Hold the pending authorization in the session instead, where oauth_callback already keeps its code_verifier and state: - start_oauth_device_flow records the code, what the page displays, the family, the item and the return_to context under :snaptrade_device_flow. - complete_oauth_device_flow reads the code from there and refuses unless the flow was started by this session for this family and this item. A device_code parameter is no longer read at all, so there is no longer a way to inject one. - return_to and accountable_type come from the session too, so completion needs nothing from the form to find its way back. The code now never reaches the browser, which also makes the previous commit's log filtering a second line of defence rather than the only one. A failed attempt keeps the code only while it is still redeemable: expired_token and access_denied clear it so the page offers a fresh start, while a transient failure leaves it in place to retry. expires_in and interval are no longer carried anywhere, since nothing ever read them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X3f2UyefTKJrgvNjPnhMRk * fix(snaptrade): use one token endpoint for every grant poll_device_token resolved the token endpoint from the cached discovery document while exchange_code and refresh_tokens used TOKEN_URL, so which URL a device-issued token was refreshed at depended on whether the 12h metadata cache was still warm. If the discovered endpoint ever differed from the constant, a device-authorized item would work until the cache lapsed and then fail its first rotation -- and fail invisibly, since a refresh failure marks the connection requires_update. Resolve it by removing the choice rather than by making refresh depend on discovery. RFC 8628 §3.4 redeems a device code at the authorization server's token endpoint, the same one the authorization code grant uses: there is one token endpoint, not one per grant, and nothing to keep in sync between issuing a token and refreshing it. TOKEN_URL is also the endpoint the browser flow has been using in production, so it is the one with evidence behind it. Discovery is still consulted, but only for device_authorization_endpoint, which has no hardcoded equivalent. This also keeps refresh free of any network dependency it did not already have: reintroducing discovery there would have put a fetch, with retries and backoff, in front of every token rotation on items that never needed one. Also restore the previous OAuth configuration in the missing-client-id test instead of leaving the client id nil, which made it order-dependent. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X3f2UyefTKJrgvNjPnhMRk --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
0aa43de10a |
Add experimental Swift-native Sure Insights app (#3134)
* Add Swift-native Sure app * Fix push subscriptions schema for CI * Address native app review feedback * Address remaining native app review feedback * Use Flutter app logo for native icon * Honor insight notification preferences and locale --------- Co-authored-by: Juan Jose Mata <2v8shcb6pz@privaterelay.appleid.com> Co-authored-by: sure-admin <sure-admin@splashblot.com> |
||
|
|
311f06e404 |
Fix budget cache invalidation after transaction deletion (#2808)
Signed-off-by: Juan José Mata <juanjo.mata@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Juan José Mata <juanjo.mata@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
3e79de5b64 |
perf: memoize Family#balance_sheet/investment_statement, cache transactions-index side queries (#3058)
* perf: memoize Family#balance_sheet/investment_statement, cache transactions-index side queries The account sidebar renders on every page (mobile + desktop, 3 tabs each) and calls Family#balance_sheet multiple times per render; neither it nor Family#investment_statement/InvestmentStatement#current_holdings were memoized, so each call rebuilt the underlying query from scratch. Memoize both per-user (family sharing means different users must not share a cached BalanceSheet/InvestmentStatement). Also cache TransactionsController#index's uncategorized_count and projected_recurring lookups, which run unconditionally on every request regardless of whether the underlying data changed, using the same entries_cache_version-keyed pattern already used elsewhere in the codebase (e.g. Transaction::Search#totals). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: address PR #3058 review feedback on cache invalidation and query reuse - Invalidate transactions-index caches when the current user's AccountShare access changes, not just on entries/recurring updates (CodeRabbit/Codex flagged revoked users could see stale data for up to a day). - Use full-precision timestamps instead of to_i in the cache keys so same-second updates aren't missed. - Reuse the already-memoized investment_account_ids in InvestmentStatement#current_holdings instead of an extra any? query. - Assert the rendered response instead of a controller instance variable in the uncategorized_count test, per CodeRabbit nitpick. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: assert rendered response, not implementation details, in PR #3058 tests Two CodeRabbit nitpicks from the second review round: the uncategorized-count cache-reuse assertion matched a scope name that never appears in generated SQL (making it vacuous), and the recurring-cache revocation test read the controller's private @projected_recurring ivar instead of the rendered page. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: bust transactions-index caches on entry/recurring deletion and account status change jjmata's PR review flagged two invalidation gaps: hard-deleting an uncategorized entry or recurring transaction left the previous max updated_at unchanged (cache never busted), and toggling an account's active status doesn't touch entries/AccountShare at all. Fold in counts (like account_share_version already did) and a new Family#accounts_status_version, and move the version helpers onto Family/Current per the "fat models, skinny controllers" nit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: include merchant version in projected_recurring cache key Editing or deleting a FamilyMerchant doesn't touch recurring_transactions, so the cached projected-recurring list (rendered with merchant name/logo, expires_in: 1.day) could show stale merchant data for up to a day. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(transactions): version projected-recurring cache by referenced merchants, not just FamilyMerchant recurring_transactions.merchant_id can point at a shared ProviderMerchant (recurring detection copies transaction.merchant_id), not just a family-owned FamilyMerchant. merchants_version only tracked Family#merchants (FamilyMerchant), so a ProviderMerchant update (e.g. ProviderMerchant::Enhancer setting name/logo) left the cached projected recurring list stale for up to a day. Replace Family#merchants_version with #recurring_transaction_merchants_version, scoped to the merchant records actually referenced by the family's recurring transactions (both FamilyMerchant and ProviderMerchant), and bump the cache key version. Also fix a flaky test assertion that matched all recurring_transactions-table queries instead of the actual projection query, since computing the cache key itself still runs small COUNT/MAX queries against that table on a cache hit. --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Gerald <248542187+gfr-free@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
00d35993eb |
Exclude pending transactions from balances (#2897)
* Exclude pending transactions from balances * Fix balance regression assertions * Add pending balance review regressions * Fix merge conflict commit --------- Signed-off-by: Juan José Mata <juanjo.mata@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Juan José Mata <juanjo.mata@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Juan José Mata <jjmata@jjmata.com> |
||
|
|
12eb9e15fb |
fix(lunchflow): mark sync unhealthy when importer reports fetch failures (#1796) (#1873)
* fix(lunchflow): mark sync unhealthy when importer reports fetch failures (#1796) `LunchflowItem::Syncer#perform_sync` called `lunchflow_item.import_latest_lunchflow_data` but threw the result away and then ran `collect_health_stats(sync, errors: nil)`. The importer already catches per-account 429/500 fetch errors, bumps a `transactions_failed` counter, and returns `success: false` — but the syncer never inspected the return value, so the parent sync was marked completed/green even when zero transactions were imported because every fetch had been rate-limited. Capture the importer result and translate any `accounts_failed` / `transactions_failed` / `error` fields into the `{ message:, category: }` error shape `collect_health_stats` expects. The exception-path `rescue` branch is unchanged. Closes #1796 * test(lunchflow): i18n the new health messages + add syncer invariant tests (#1796) Two pieces of follow-up feedback: - @coderabbitai + @JSONbored: the three new operator-facing strings should go through I18n.t. Add keys under provider_warnings.lunchflow_* (matching the existing provider_warnings.limited_investment_data shape) and use Rails pluralization for the count-bearing entries. Other locales follow the repo's normal translation flow. - @jjmata + @JSONbored: add tests for the invariants. New LunchflowItem::SyncerTest covers: * successful import → sync healthy * accounts_failed positive → sync unhealthy with localized message * transactions_failed positive → sync unhealthy with localized message * both counters positive → both error entries recorded in order * sync raises → sync_error category + reraise (existing rescue branch) @jjmata also asked to confirm the importer contract: LunchflowItem::Importer#import returns 'success: accounts_failed == 0 && transactions_failed == 0' (see importer.rb), so the early 'return [] if import_result[:success]' guard is safe — success is never true while either counter is positive. --------- Co-authored-by: jeffrey701 <jeffrey701@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
fd6f4ff078 |
Add live AI checks to system health (#3155)
* Add live AI checks to system health Give super admins a dedicated AI status view with bounded liveness probes for LLMs, vector stores, pgvector, and embedding endpoints. Record sanitized failures in both the system debug log and Rails logger, and document the recommended local configuration.\n\nCloses #3145 * Fix AI health CI checks * Address AI health review feedback * Correct Ollama model preload guidance * Distinguish OpenAI-compatible providers * Make Ollama startup readiness explicit * Recognize Cloudflare AI endpoints |
||
|
|
c26b16d36f |
chore(goals): drop copy-pasted duplicates and an unused lock-key helper (#3159)
`Account#goal_earmarked_total` and `Account#free_to_earmark` were each defined twice, byte for byte, with no `private` boundary or singleton class between the blocks — a copy-paste artifact where the second definition silently overwrote the first. Keep one copy of each. `Goal.advisory_lock_key_for` had no caller anywhere in app/; the only reference was a test asserting the dead helper was deterministic. Remove both. No behavior change. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DJ1npaGEHr6t2HW1rYZdt4 Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
41d4db38dc |
docs(api): sync openapi.yaml with merchants import and transfer fee fields (#2961)
* docs(api): sync openapi.yaml with merchants import and transfer fee fields Regenerate the OpenAPI document from the request specs already on main (bundle exec rake rswag:specs:swaggerize). Purely additive: documents the POST /api/v1/merchants CSV import endpoint, the MerchantImportResult schema, and the transfer source/destination fee fields that were intentionally left out of #2823. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(docs): describe merchants CSV multipart body as an object schema type: file is a Swagger 2 idiom that is invalid under OpenAPI 3.0.3; declare the multipart part as an object with a required binary file property (matching params[:file]) and regenerate the document. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
37a65be4b8 | Fix Mintlify docs workflow (#3156) | ||
|
|
721fc394ec |
fix(securities): give prefixed crypto tickers their logo back (#3151)
Security#crypto_base_asset only stripped a fiat suffix — "BTCUSD" gave "BTC" — so it answered nil for the "CRYPTO:BTC" form, which is the form every crypto integration writes: the on-chain wallets, Kraken, CoinStats and Binance all store the prefix. display_logo_url feeds that nil to the crypto branch, so none of those securities carried a logo at all. Provider::BinancePublic already parses every shape it accepts — the pair form, the prefixed pair, the bare base asset and the USD stablecoins — so this delegates instead of growing a second parser next to it. The parsing moves to a class method for that; the private instance method stays as a delegator, so its own callers and their tests are untouched. Verified across the four documented forms: CRYPTO:BTC and BTCUSD both give BTC, CRYPTO:ETH gives ETH, CRYPTO:USDT gives USDT. A logo still needs BRAND_FETCH_CLIENT_ID configured — this fixes the parsing, not the hosting requirement. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
6a9c30a172 |
Bump version to next iteration after v0.7.4-alpha.8 release (#3144)
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
79c826c0e3 |
Add Sure client overview docs (#2832)
* Add Sure client overview docs * docs: address client API comments |