Files
sure/test/models/holding/materializer_test.rb
LPW fa78e1d292 Improve handling of cost_basis during holding materialization and display (#619)
- Refactored `persist_holdings` to separate and conditionally upsert holdings with and without cost_basis.
- Updated `avg_cost` logic to treat 0 cost_basis as unknown and return nil when cost_basis cannot be determined.
- Modified trend and investment calculation to exclude holdings with unknown cost_basis.
- Adjusted `average_cost` formatting to handle nil values in API responses and views.
- Added comprehensive tests to ensure cost_basis preservation and fallback behavior.
- Localized `unknown` label for display when cost_basis is unavailable.

Co-authored-by: Josh Waldrep <joshua.waldrep5+github@gmail.com>
2026-01-11 23:58:51 +01:00

79 lines
2.9 KiB
Ruby

require "test_helper"
class Holding::MaterializerTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
include EntriesTestHelper
setup do
@family = families(:empty)
@account = @family.accounts.create!(name: "Test", balance: 20000, cash_balance: 20000, currency: "USD", accountable: Investment.new)
@aapl = securities(:aapl)
end
test "syncs holdings" do
create_trade(@aapl, account: @account, qty: 1, price: 200, date: Date.current)
# Should have yesterday's and today's holdings
assert_difference "@account.holdings.count", 2 do
Holding::Materializer.new(@account, strategy: :forward).materialize_holdings
end
end
test "purges stale holdings for unlinked accounts" do
# Since the account has no entries, there should be no holdings
Holding.create!(account: @account, security: @aapl, qty: 1, price: 100, amount: 100, currency: "USD", date: Date.current)
assert_difference "Holding.count", -1 do
Holding::Materializer.new(@account, strategy: :forward).materialize_holdings
end
end
test "preserves provider cost_basis when trade-derived cost_basis is nil" do
# Simulate a provider-imported holding with cost_basis (e.g., from SimpleFIN)
# This is the realistic scenario: linked account with provider holdings but no trades
provider_cost_basis = BigDecimal("150.00")
holding = Holding.create!(
account: @account,
security: @aapl,
qty: 10,
price: 200,
amount: 2000,
currency: "USD",
date: Date.current,
cost_basis: provider_cost_basis
)
# Use :reverse strategy (what linked accounts use) - doesn't purge holdings
# The AAPL holding has no trades, so computed cost_basis is nil
# The materializer should preserve the provider cost_basis, not overwrite with nil
Holding::Materializer.new(@account, strategy: :reverse).materialize_holdings
holding.reload
assert_equal provider_cost_basis, holding.cost_basis,
"Provider cost_basis should be preserved when no trades exist for this security"
end
test "updates cost_basis when trade-derived cost_basis is available" do
# Create a holding with provider cost_basis
Holding.create!(
account: @account,
security: @aapl,
qty: 10,
price: 200,
amount: 2000,
currency: "USD",
date: Date.current,
cost_basis: BigDecimal("150.00") # Provider says $150
)
# Create a trade that gives us a different cost basis
create_trade(@aapl, account: @account, qty: 10, price: 180, date: Date.current)
# Use :reverse strategy - with trades, it should compute cost_basis from them
Holding::Materializer.new(@account, strategy: :reverse).materialize_holdings
holding = @account.holdings.find_by(security: @aapl, date: Date.current)
assert_equal BigDecimal("180.00"), holding.cost_basis,
"Trade-derived cost_basis should override provider cost_basis when available"
end
end